De Novo · Granted
GrantedCytoscan (R) DX
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Affymetrix, Inc. · PFX System, Microarray-Based, Genome-Wide, Postnatal Chromosomal Abnormality Detection
Granted on Jan 17, 2014 as a new device type through De Novo after a 30-day review. 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Jan 17, 2014
- Review
- 30 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- PFX
- Recalls
- None
1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- This deviceDEN130018 Cytoscan (R) DXAffymetrix, Inc. · 2014
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK163367 GenetiSure Dx Postnatal AssayAgilent Technologies, Inc. · 2017 · Recalled
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K163367GenetiSure Dx Postnatal AssayAgilent Technologies, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | DEN130018 | Cytoscan (R) DX | Affymetrix, Inc. | 2014 | — |
| +1 | K163367 | GenetiSure Dx Postnatal Assay | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 2017 | 1 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA De Novo database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in PFX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Does it have a predicate?
De Novo decisions do not claim a predicate device.
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K163367 | GenetiSure Dx Postnatal Assay | 2017 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K163367 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., 2017) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All PFX devicesPFX System, Microarray-Based, Genome-Wide, Postnatal Chromosomal Abnormality Detection: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · PFX
1in 2017
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · PFX
Too few PFX 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · PFX
No recall names PFX since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · PFX
2in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code PFX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
https://510kreport.com/device/DEN130018 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “DEN130018: Cytoscan (R) DX.” Lineage record from FDA De Novo data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/DEN130018
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026