510(k) Report

De Novo · Granted

Granted

ARC-EX System

DEN240014De NovoGranted Dec 19, 2024266-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5851

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Onward Medical, Inc. · SDO Transcutaneous Electrical Spine Stimulator To Improve Skeletal Muscle Strength And Sensation

Granted on Dec 19, 2024 as a new device type through De Novo after a 266-day review. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 19, 2024
Review
266 days
Class
Class II
Product code
SDO
Recalls
None

3 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2025: 1 descendant cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared2020202220242026
  1. This deviceDEN240014 ARC-EX SystemOnward Medical, Inc. · 2024
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK253638 xStep (xStep)Spinex, Inc. · 2026
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK252893 ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System…Aneuvo · 2026
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK251821 ARC-EX SystemOnward Medical, Inc. · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K253638xStep (xStep)Spinex, Inc. · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K252893ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011); ReCure®…Aneuvo · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K251821ARC-EX SystemOnward Medical, Inc. · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)DEN240014ARC-EX SystemOnward Medical, Inc.2024—
+1K253638xStep (xStep)Spinex, Inc.2026—
+1K252893ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011)…Aneuvo2026—
+1K251821ARC-EX SystemOnward Medical, Inc.2025—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202510
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of DEN240014, 2024–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA De Novo database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in SDO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new SDO device

  1. #1 K253638 xStep (xStep)score 11.2 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

De Novo decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it? (3)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K253638xStep (xStep)Spinex, Inc.20260
K252893ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-001); ExaStim® Stimulation System (EXA-011); ReCure®…Aneuvo20260
K251821ARC-EX SystemOnward Medical, Inc.20250

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K253638 (Spinex, Inc., 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All SDO devices

SDO Transcutaneous Electrical Spine Stimulator To Improve Skeletal Muscle Strength And Sensation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · SDO

2so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · SDO

Too few SDO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · SDO

No recall names SDO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · SDO

No MAUDE report names SDO since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20241—00
20251—00
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The ARCEX System is intended to deliver programmed, transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation in conjunction with functional task practice in the clinic to improve hand sensation and strength in individuals between 18 and 75 years old that present with a chronic, non-progressive neurological deficit resulting from an incomplete spinal cord injury (C2-C8 inclusive).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “DEN240014: ARC-EX System.” Lineage record from FDA De Novo data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/DEN240014

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026