510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

C&B Resin Plus Powder/Liquid, Models Retemp A2, A3, A3.5, CL, Retemp B2, B3, C2, D3, WH, Retemp MO

K000894510(k) TraditionalCleared May 19, 200060-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3770

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Dental Ventures of America, Inc. · EBG Crown And Bridge, Temporary, Resin

Cleared on May 19, 2000 after a 60-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 19, 2000
Review
60 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EBG
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK000894 C&B Resin Plus Powder/Liquid, Models Retemp A2, A3, A3.5, CL, Retemp…Dental Ventures of America, Inc. · 2000
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK103474 Ena Temp and Enamel Plus Temp (Two Different Proprietary Names for…Micerium S.P.A. · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K103474Ena Temp and Enamel Plus Temp (Two Different Proprietary Names for the Same Product)Micerium S.P.A. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K000894C&B Resin Plus Powder/Liquid, Models Retemp A2, A3, A3.5, CL, Retemp B2, B3…Dental Ventures of America, Inc.2000—
+1K103474Ena Temp and Enamel Plus Temp (Two Different Proprietary Names for the Same…Micerium S.P.A.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K000894, 2000–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBG device

  1. #1 K253380 “FLNT Base” and “FLNT Temp”score 12.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K103474Ena Temp and Enamel Plus Temp (Two Different Proprietary Names for the Same Product)Micerium S.P.A.20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K103474 (Micerium S.P.A., 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All EBG devices

EBG Crown And Bridge, Temporary, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EBG

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 92009: 22010: 52011: 102012: 52013: 22014: 32015: 62016: 42017: 22018: 42019: 62020: 142021: 32022: 32023: 22024: 52025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 14 (2020) · low 2 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBG

106in 2025

2007: 64 days median2008: 83 days median2010: 103 days median2011: 96 days median2012: 90 days median2014: 114 days median2015: 209 days median2016: 163 days median2018: 202 days median2019: 98 days median2020: 194 days median2021: 265 days median2022: 73 days median2024: 144 days median2025: 106 days median
2007high 265 (2021) · low 64 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBG

1in 2020

2009: 12020: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBG

1in 2025

2007: 42008: 42009: 12010: 12011: 12012: 52013: 112014: 232015: 262016: 82017: 42019: 62020: 22021: 42022: 22025: 1
2007high 26 (2015) · low 0 (2018)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200736404
200898304
20092—11
2010510301
2011109601
201259005
20132—011
20143114023
20156209026
2016416308
20172—04
2018420200
201969806
20201419412
2021326504
202237302
20232—00
2024514400
2025410601
20262—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K000894: C&B Resin Plus Powder/Liquid, Models Retemp A2, A3, A3.5, CL, Retemp B2, B3, C2, D3, WH, Retemp MO.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K000894

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026