510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Trident Acetabular Shells: PS

K001449510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 4, 200087-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented

Cleared on Aug 4, 2000 as substantially equivalent to K983502 (Osteonics Corp., 1998) and 3 other predicates after an 87-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1990. 69 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Aug 4, 2000
Review
87 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LZO
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K903362 (1990). 11 ancestors in all. 69 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1994: 3 other ancestors1995: 4 other ancestors2001: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2019: 8 descendants cleared2017: 5 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2013: 2 descendants cleared2018: 4 descendants cleared2022: 7 descendants cleared2020: 4 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2026: 7 descendants cleared2025: 6 descendants cleared2024: 7 descendants clearedK903362 · Osteolock (TM) Acetabular Cup · Howmedica Corp. · 1990K971854 · Osteolock Acetabular Shell System · Howmedica Corp. · 19971990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors2 generations back: 6 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 5 descendants3 generations forward: 15 descendants4 generations forward: 14 descendants5 generations forward: 4 descendants6 generations forward: 3 descendants7 generations forward: 8 descendants8 generations forward: 11 descendants9 generations forward: 8 descendants K971854 · Osteolock Acetabular Shell System · Howmedica Corp. · 1997K903362 · Osteolock (TM) Acetabular Cup · Howmedica Corp. · 19900+5
  1. Root · 2 generations backK903362 Osteolock (TM) Acetabular CupHowmedica Corp. · 1990
  2. 1 generation backK971854 Osteolock Acetabular Shell SystemHowmedica Corp. · 1997
  3. This deviceK001449 Trident Acetabular Shells: PSHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2000
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 68 of its ownK013676 Trident Hemispherical Acetabular ShellsHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2001 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 61 of its ownK081171 Tritanium Acetabular Shell SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2008
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 23 of its ownK040412 Trident T Acetabular ShellsStryker Orthopaedics · 2004
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 22 of its ownK101072 Tritanium Peri-Apatitie Acetabular Solid-Backed Shell, Tritanium…Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2011
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 21 of its ownK143085 Stryker Orthopaedics Acetabular Shells, Femoral Stems and Total Hip…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 69 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2001: 12004: 12007: 12008: 12011: 12012: 12013: 22015: 22016: 42017: 52018: 42019: 82020: 42021: 42022: 72023: 32024: 72025: 62026: 7
2001high 8 (2019) · low 0 (2002)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 69 · See all
  • K013676Trident Hemispherical Acetabular ShellsHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2001 · cites it directly68descendants
  • K081171Tritanium Acetabular Shell SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2008 · 2 generations on61descendants
  • K040412Trident T Acetabular ShellsStryker Orthopaedics · 2004 · 2 generations on23descendants
  • K101072Tritanium Peri-Apatitie Acetabular Solid-Backed Shell, Tritanium Peri-ApatiteHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2011 · 3 generations on22descendants
  • K143085Stryker Orthopaedics Acetabular Shells, Femoral Stems and Total Hip Instruments for use…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · 2 generations on21descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K903362Osteolock (TM) Acetabular CupHowmedica Corp.1990—
−1K971854Osteolock Acetabular Shell SystemHowmedica Corp.1997—
0 (this device)K001449Trident Acetabular Shells: PSHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2000—
+1K013676Trident Hemispherical Acetabular ShellsHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20018
+2K081171Tritanium Acetabular Shell SystemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2008—
+2K040412Trident T Acetabular ShellsStryker Orthopaedics2004—
+3K101072Tritanium Peri-Apatitie Acetabular Solid-Backed Shell, Tritanium Peri-ApatiteHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2011—
+2K143085Stryker Orthopaedics Acetabular Shells, Femoral Stems and Total Hip…Stryker Orthopaedics20152

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199430
199540
199710
199810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
200410
200710
200810
201110
201210
201320
201520
201640
201750
201840
201980
202040
202140
202270
202330
202470
202560
202670
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K001449, 1990–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LZO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LZO device

  1. #1 K192827 Quadra-Pscore 19.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K983502Osteonics Secur-Fit AD Generation II Acetabular Component System
Summary page 1
…Uncemented Prosthesis 21 CFR §888.3353 Predicate Device Identification " Trident Acetabular Shells (K983502 - originally called the "Osteonics Secur=Fit AD Generation 11Acetabular Component System") " Osteol…
Osteonics Corp.19981
*K971854Osteolock Acetabular Shell System
Summary page 1
…nally called the "Osteonics Secur=Fit AD Generation 11Acetabular Component System") " Osteolock NP and Osteolock Cluster Acetabular Shells (K971854,,-and K933-1,02) " Partnership Revision Femoral Components (K972893) Device Description The subject Triden…
Howmedica Corp.1997—
*K933102Howmedica Acetabular Shell W/Screw HolesHowmedica Corp.1994—
*K972893Partnership Revision Femoral Stems
Summary page 1
…nt System") " Osteolock NP and Osteolock Cluster Acetabular Shells (K971854,,-and K933-1,02) " Partnership Revision Femoral Components (K972893) Device Description The subject Trident Acetabular Shells are characterized by the following features: " Shell subst…
Howmedica Corp.1997—

Also cleared against K983502: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (69)

See all 69

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K013676Trident Hemispherical Acetabular ShellsHowmedica Osteonics Corp.200168

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 10 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.8 years on median.
  • 3 of the 11 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K013676 (Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 2001) has gone furthest, with 68 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K983502.

How does its category compare?

All LZO devices

LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LZO

14in 2025

2007: 92008: 112009: 72010: 152011: 132012: 142013: 262014: 132015: 122016: 102017: 162018: 182019: 282020: 182021: 122022: 112023: 102024: 112025: 142026 (partial year): 9
2007high 28 (2019) · low 7 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LZO

119in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 63 days median2009: 83 days median2010: 78 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 98 days median2013: 100 days median2014: 85 days median2015: 115 days median2016: 177 days median2017: 257 days median2018: 163 days median2019: 109 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 170 days median2022: 279 days median2023: 122 days median2024: 111 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 102 days median
2007high 279 (2022) · low 63 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LZO

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 132009: 422011: 102012: 142014: 12015: 12016: 92017: 52018: 22019: 42020: 32022: 42023: 22024: 12025: 1
2007high 42 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LZO

3,244in 2025

2007: 1382008: 1252009: 1892010: 3942011: 5442012: 9632013: 1,3702014: 1,4772015: 1,3482016: 1,7282017: 2,1652018: 3,1332019: 3,0662020: 1,9632021: 2,1992022: 1,9852023: 2,0662024: 2,5862025: 3,244
2007high 3,244 (2025) · low 125 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LZO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20079872138
2008116313125
200978342189
201015780394
2011138710544
2012149814963
20132610001,370
2014138511,477
20151211511,348
20161017791,728
20171625752,165
20181816323,133
20192810943,066
20201811231,963
20211217002,199
20221127941,985
20231012222,066
20241111112,586
20251411913,244
202691020—

What is it indicated for?

The subject Trident Acetabular Shells are single-use devices intended for cemented or cementless fixation within the prepared acetabulurn. The subject acetabular shells are intended for use with mating Trident Polyethylene Cup Inserts. Indications: Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis. Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral…

Read the full statement (100 words)

The subject Trident Acetabular Shells are single-use devices intended for cemented or cementless fixation within the prepared acetabulurn. The subject acetabular shells are intended for use with mating Trident Polyethylene Cup Inserts.

Indications:

Painful, disabling joint disease of the hip resulting from: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or late stage avascular necrosis.

Revision of previous unsuccessful femoral head replacement; cup arthroplasty.or.oxher procedure.

Clinical management problems where arthrodesis or alternative reconstructive techniques are less likely to achieve satisfactory results.

Where bone stock is of poor quality or is inadequate for other reconstructive techniques as indicated by deficiencies of the acetabulum.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K001449: Trident Acetabular Shells: PS.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K001449

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026