510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Vertex Reconstruction System

K003780510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 28, 2001295-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Sep 28, 2001 after a 295-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 1 of the 421 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 420 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 28, 2001
Review
295 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

420 later devices descend from it, 21 citing it directly. 1 of the 421 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 10 descendants cleared2013: 19 descendants cleared2007: 7 descendants cleared2004: 4 descendants cleared2012: 17 descendants cleared2005: 6 descendants cleared2006: 5 descendants cleared2010: 4 descendants cleared2014: 21 descendants cleared2009: 8 descendants cleared2018: 21 descendants cleared2017: 20 descendants cleared2008: 8 descendants cleared2015: 25 descendants cleared2021: 22 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12023: 38 descendants cleared2020: 22 descendants cleared2025: 30 descendants cleared2022: 24 descendants cleared2026: 36 descendants cleared2016: 19 descendants cleared2019: 17 descendants cleared2024: 37 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK003780 Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2001
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 373 of its ownK042524 Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 325 of its ownK042789 Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 262 of its ownK053483 Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2006
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 259 of its ownK042402 Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2004
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 254 of its ownK052376 Modification to: Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2005

Showing 5 of 420 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 42005: 62006: 52007: 72008: 82009: 82010: 42011: 102012: 172013: 192014: 212015: 252016: 192017: 202018: 212019: 172020: 222021: 222022: 242023: 382024: 372025: 302026: 36
2004high 38 (2023) · low 4 (2004)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 420 · See all
  • K042524Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004 · cites it directly373descendants
  • K042789Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2004 · cites it directly325descendants
  • K053483Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2006 · 2 generations on262descendants
  • K042402Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly259descendants
  • K052376Modification to: Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2005 · cites it directly254descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K003780Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2001—
+1K042524Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
+1K042789Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004—
+2K053483Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2006—
+1K042402Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2004—
+1K052376Modification to: Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2005—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200440
200560
200650
200770
200880
200980
201040
2011100
2012170
2013190
2014210
2015250
2016190
2017200
2018210
2019170
2020220
2021221
2022240
2023380
2024370
2025300
2026360
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K003780, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (420)

See all 420

21 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K042524Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004373
K042789Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004325
K042402Modification to Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2004259
K052376Modification to: Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2005254
K090714Vertex Reconstruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2009233
K042498Vertex Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004188
K050391Protex CT Cervicothoracic Spinal SystemGlobus Medical, Inc.2005148
K110522Vertex Reconstruction System, Vertex Select Reconstruction SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2011106
K070638Theken Atoll Cervico-Thoracic SystemTheken Spine, LLC200759
K133556Virage Oct Spinal Fixation SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.201427

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 4 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K042524 (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2004) has gone furthest, with 373 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and the thoracic spine Cl T3 the VERTE3P Reconstruction System is indicated for the following DDD neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies spondylolisthesis spinal stenosis fracture dislocation failed previous fusion and or tumors Hooks and Rods The hooks and rods are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following…

Read the full statement (154 words)

When intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and the thoracic spine Cl T3 the VERTE3P Reconstruction System is indicated for the following

DDD neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies spondylolisthesis spinal stenosis fracture dislocation failed previous fusion and or tumors

Hooks and Rods

The hooks and rods are also intended to provide stabilization to promote fusion following reduction of fracture dislocation or trauma in the cervical upper thoracic C 1 T3 spine

Multi axial Screws Lateral Connectors

The use of multi axial screws 3 5mm and 4 0mm cancellous and 4 0mm cortical is limited to placement in Tl T3 in treating thoracic conditions only The multi axial screws are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine

Titanium ATLAS Cable System to be used with the VERTEX Reconstruction System allows for cable attachment to the posterior cervical or thoracic spine

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K003780: Vertex Reconstruction System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K003780

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026