510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Neolead

K011564510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 3, 2002227-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2360

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Neotech Products, Inc. · DRX Electrode, Electrocardiograph

Cleared on Jan 3, 2002 after a 227-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 30 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jan 3, 2002
Review
227 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

30 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 2 descendants cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2017: 3 descendants cleared2023: 4 descendants cleared2018: 3 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2026: 3 descendants cleared2021: 2 descendants cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK011564 NeoleadNeotech Products, Inc. · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 27 of its ownK050443 Accu-LeadKentec Medical, Inc. · 2005
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 26 of its ownK092744 Neonatal Ecg Electrode, M203KENR & D Medical Products, Inc. · 2009
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 24 of its ownK132694 Nuvasive NVM5 SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 23 of its ownK141968 Nuvasive NVM5 SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 22 of its ownK143641 NuVasive NVM5 SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 30 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2005: 12009: 12010: 22011: 12014: 22015: 12016: 12017: 32018: 32019: 12021: 22022: 22023: 42024: 12025: 22026: 3
2005high 4 (2023) · low 0 (2006)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 30 · See all
  • K050443Accu-LeadKentec Medical, Inc. · 2005 · cites it directly27descendants
  • K092744Neonatal Ecg Electrode, M203KENR & D Medical Products, Inc. · 2009 · cites it directly26descendants
  • K132694Nuvasive NVM5 SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2014 · 2 generations on24descendants
  • K141968Nuvasive NVM5 SystemNuvasive, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on23descendants
  • K143641NuVasive NVM5 SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated · 2015 · 4 generations on22descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K011564NeoleadNeotech Products, Inc.2002—
+1K050443Accu-LeadKentec Medical, Inc.2005—
+1K092744Neonatal Ecg Electrode, M203KENR & D Medical Products, Inc.2009—
+2K132694Nuvasive NVM5 SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated2014—
+3K141968Nuvasive NVM5 SystemNuvasive, Inc.2014—
+4K143641NuVasive NVM5 SystemNu Vasive, Incorporated20151

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
200910
201020
201110
201420
201510
201610
201730
201830
201910
202120
202220
202340
202410
202520
202630
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K011564, 2002–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (11)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Kittycat-Kendall-LTP
Named without a submission number
—
*—Neotrode-ConMe Corp
Named without a submission number
—
*—Klear-Trace-CAS Medical Systems, Inc
Named without a submission number
—
*—SilveReez-Clinimark
Named without a submission number
—
*—H/P —HewlettPackard
Named without a submission number
—
*—NeoBar
Named without a submission number
—
*—NeoSmile
Named without a submission number
—
*—NeoBridge
Named without a submission number
—
*—NeoHold
Named without a submission number
—
*—NeoShades
Named without a submission number
—
*—NeoBond
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (30)

See all 30

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K050443Accu-LeadKentec Medical, Inc.200527
K092744Neonatal Ecg Electrode, M203KENR & D Medical Products, Inc.200926
K101685IP-SETIntegral Process Sas20100
K100129Ambu Blue Sensor Neo, Ambu Blue Sensor Neo XAmbu A/S20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K050443 (Kentec Medical, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 27 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DRX devices

DRX Electrode, Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DRX

1in 2017

2007: 32008: 32009: 72010: 52013: 12014: 12017: 1
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRX

78in 2010

2007: 147 days median2008: 17 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 78 days median
2007high 147 (2007) · low 17 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRX

6in 2022

2010: 42015: 12020: 52021: 12022: 6
2007high 6 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRX

250in 2025

2007: 472008: 152009: 362010: 482011: 802012: 412013: 702014: 272015: 582016: 372017: 552018: 432019: 502020: 532021: 552022: 612023: 1132024: 612025: 250
2007high 250 (2025) · low 15 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073147047
2008317015
2009789036
2010578448
20110—080
20120—041
20131—070
20141—027
20150—158
20160—037
20171—055
20180—043
20190—050
20200—553
20210—155
20220—661
20230—0113
20240—061
20250—0250
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The NeoLead Hydrocolloid/ Hydrogel electrode is intended to be used

for resting ECG monitoring on neonatal and pediatric patients in a

hospital setting.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K011564: Neolead.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K011564

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026