510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2015

Ludlow Gradient Edge Adult & Pediatric Multifunctional Electrodes

K012218510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 12, 200188-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.5550Recalls 8 (4 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

The Ludlow Company LP · DRO Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive)

Cleared on Oct 12, 2001 after an 88-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. It has a Class I recall. It has been recalled 8 times, including 4 Class I recalls.

Decided
Oct 12, 2001
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRO
Recalls
8 (4 Class I)
Predicates
0

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K012218Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Aug 19, 2015Class IIZ-2545-2015Process controlMulti-Function Defibrillation Electrodes, Pre connect- potential for damage to the wire insulation may result in a potentially increased risk for reduced or no patient therapy and patient and/or clinician burns
Aug 19, 2015Class IIZ-2546-2015Process controlMulti-Function Defibrillation Electrodes, Pre connect- potential for damage to the wire insulation may result in a potentially increased risk for reduced or no patient therapy and patient and/or clinician burns
Sep 18, 2014Class IZ-0043-2015Device DesignCovidien Medi-Trace Cadence and Kendall Defibrillation Electrodes Not Compatible for use with Philips model FR3 or FRx AEDs Defibrillators
Sep 18, 2014Class IZ-0048-2015Device DesignCovidien Medi-Trace Cadence and Kendall Defibrillation Electrodes Not Compatible for use with Philips model FR3 or FRx AEDs
Sep 18, 2014Class IZ-0044-2015Device DesignCovidien Medi-Trace Cadence and Kendall Defibrillation Electrodes Not Compatible for use with Philips model FR3 or FRx AEDs
Sep 18, 2014Class IZ-0045-2015Device DesignCovidien Medi-Trace Cadence and Kendall Defibrillation Electrodes Not Compatible for use with Philips model FR3 or FRx AEDs
Apr 8, 2013Class IIZ-1184-2013Process controlDefibrillation Electrodes may arc/spark result in thermal damage to the leadwire, which could render the device incapable of delivering the appropriate energy or shock to the patient
Apr 8, 2013Class IIZ-1185-2013Process controlDefibrillation Electrodes may arc/spark result in thermal damage to the leadwire, which could render the device incapable of delivering the appropriate energy or shock to the patient

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All DRO devices

DRO Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DRO

FDA has decided no DRO device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRO

Too few DRO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DRO

12in 2020

2010: 12014: 4, 4 Class I2020: 12
2007high 12 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (4 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRO

2in 2025

2007: 72008: 52009: 32010: 72011: 32012: 82013: 112014: 22015: 412016: 492017: 152018: 642019: 932020: 192021: 222023: 62024: 42025: 2
2007high 93 (2019) · low 0 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—07
20080—05
20090—03
20100—17
20110—03
20120—08
20130—011
20140—4 (4)2
20150—041
20160—049
20170—015
20180—064
20190—093
20200—1219
20210—022
20220—00
20230—06
20240—04
20250—02
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Ludlow Gradient Edge Adult & Pediatric Multifunctional Electrode is intended for

use in defibrillation procedures, cardioversion, pacing, and ECG monitoring.

The Ludlow Gradient Edge Adult Multifunctional Electrode is for use on adults (an adult

is defined as a patient weighing over 10 Kg). The Ludlow Gradient Edge Adult

Multifunctional Electrode is not intended for use on children or infants. The device is

non-sterile and single-use only.

The Ludlow Gradient Edge Pediatric Multifunctional Electrode is for use on pediatrics (a

pediatric is defined as a patient weighing less than 10 Kg). The device is non-sterile

and single-use only.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA 510(k) statement, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K012218: Ludlow Gradient Edge Adult & Pediatric Multifunctional Electrodes.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K012218

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026