510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Phem-Alert

K012230510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 9, 200185-day reviewClass I21 CFR 862.1550

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Femtek,Llc. · LNW Paper, Obstetric Ph

Cleared on Oct 9, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K960648 (Femtek, Inc., 1996) after an 85-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1985. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Oct 9, 2001
Review
85 days
Class
Class I
Product code
LNW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K850858 (1985). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant clearedK850858 · OB-PH - PH Test Paper · Uro Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 1985K960648 · Phem-Chek · Femtek, Inc. · 19961990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K960648 · Phem-Chek · Femtek, Inc. · 1996K850858 · OB-PH - PH Test Paper · Uro Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 19850
  1. Root · 2 generations backK850858 OB-PH - PH Test PaperUro Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 1985
  2. 1 generation backK960648 Phem-ChekFemtek, Inc. · 1996
  3. This deviceK012230 Phem-AlertFemtek,Llc. · 2001
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK032161 Phem-AlertFemtek,Llc. · 2003

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K032161Phem-AlertFemtek,Llc. · 2003 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K850858OB-PH - PH Test PaperUro Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1985—
−1K960648Phem-ChekFemtek, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K012230Phem-AlertFemtek,Llc.2001—
+1K032161Phem-AlertFemtek,Llc.2003—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K012230, 1985–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LNW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960648Phem-Chek
Summary page 1
…rade Name: pHEM-ALERT Common/Usual Name: pH paper Classification Name: “Obstetric pH Paper”, 85LNW, unclassified 3. Legally Marketed Predicate Devices pHEM-ALERT 510(k) K960648 4. Indications for Use / Intended Use The indications and intended uses for the pHEM-ALERT device are: “The pHEM-ALERT® test mc…
Femtek, Inc.1996—

Also cleared against K960648: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K032161Phem-AlertFemtek,Llc.20030

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 11.0 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K032161 (Femtek,Llc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K960648.

How does its category compare?

All LNW devices

LNW Paper, Obstetric Ph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LNW

FDA has decided no LNW device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · LNW

Too few LNW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LNW

No recall names LNW since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LNW

1in 2022

2010: 12022: 1
2007high 1 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LNW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—01
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—01
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The pHEM-ALERT® test measures vaginal pH (acidity) and is intended for use by women who have any of the following vaginal symptoms:

Itching

Burning

Unpleasant odor

Unusual discharge

This test may help decide if these symptorus are caused by an infection that may require follow-up by your healthcare provider. This test is only intended for women who have normal menstrual penods (penodxc vaginal bleeding). This device is not validated for use in pregnant women.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K012230: Phem-Alert.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K012230

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026