510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CEREC3 Vitablocks

K012517510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 1, 200187-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sirona Dental Systems GmbH · ELW Material, Impression

Cleared on Nov 1, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K994172 (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, 2000) after an 87-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000.

Decided
Nov 1, 2001
Review
87 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ELW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K994172 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K994172 · CEREC 3 · Sirona Dental Systems GmbH · 200020002002
K994172 · CEREC 3 · Sirona Dental Systems GmbH · 20000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK994172 CEREC 3Sirona Dental Systems GmbH · 2000
  2. This deviceK012517 CEREC3 VitablocksSirona Dental Systems GmbH · 2001
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K994172CEREC 3Sirona Dental Systems GmbH2000—
0 (this device)K012517CEREC3 VitablocksSirona Dental Systems GmbH2001—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K012517, 2000–2001Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ELW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ELW device

  1. #1 K254152 Dia-X Sil Light Bodyscore 14.1 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K994172CEREC 3
Summary page 1
…mic Dental Restoration Systems Classification Name: Impression Material 3. PREDICATE DEVICES CEREC?® 3 Ceramic Dental Restoration System with Scanning Milling Machine (K994172) 4. INTENDED USE The CEREC? inLab and CEREC® Scan Dental Restoration Milling Machines are intended to be used in the computer-a…
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH2000—

Also cleared against K994172: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K994172.

How does its category compare?

All ELW devices

ELW Material, Impression: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · ELW

2in 2025

2007: 72008: 112009: 72010: 52011: 92012: 72013: 52014: 112015: 82016: 72017: 32018: 52019: 22020: 42021: 32022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 3
2007high 11 (2008) · low 2 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ELW

98in 2024

2007: 60 days median2008: 30 days median2009: 43 days median2010: 88 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 67 days median2014: 122 days median2015: 93 days median2016: 166 days median2017: 89 days median2018: 126 days median2020: 99 days median2021: 76 days median2022: 60 days median2024: 98 days median2026 (partial year): 268 days median
2007high 268 (2026) · low 30 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ELW

3in 2016

2010: 12012: 12013: 32016: 3
2007high 3 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ELW

22in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 72010: 162011: 152012: 142013: 322014: 352015: 182016: 152017: 172018: 142019: 242020: 82021: 62022: 92023: 132024: 32025: 22
2007high 35 (2014) · low 3 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ELW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200776009
20081130017
200974307
2010588116
2011983015
2012787114
2013567332
201411122035
2015893018
20167166315
2017389017
20185126014
20192—024
202049908
202137606
202276009
20232—013
202439803
20252—022
202632680—

What is it indicated for?

The CEREC® inLab and CEREC® Scan Dental Restoration Milling Machines are intended to be used in the computer-aided design and milling of ceramic dental restorations, including inlays, onlays, veneers, crowns (full and partial), crown caps and bridge frameworks.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K012517: CEREC3 Vitablocks.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K012517

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026