510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Aramis Dermatlogic Laser

K012545510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 5, 200190-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lumedics, Ltd. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Nov 5, 2001 after a 90-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 318 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 5, 2001
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

318 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2026: 24 descendants cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2013: 7 descendants cleared2007: 7 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2008: 8 descendants cleared2021: 17 descendants cleared2010: 5 descendants cleared2014: 9 descendants cleared2009: 6 descendants cleared2011: 10 descendants cleared2012: 6 descendants cleared2015: 10 descendants cleared2022: 32 descendants cleared2024: 39 descendants cleared2016: 12 descendants cleared2017: 12 descendants cleared2018: 17 descendants cleared2020: 24 descendants cleared2025: 37 descendants cleared2019: 10 descendants cleared2023: 22 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK012545 Aramis Dermatlogic LaserLumedics, Ltd. · 2001
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 317 of its ownK023734 Aramis II Dermatological LaserQuantel Medical · 2003
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 316 of its ownK040617 Reliant Laser System IIReliant Technologies, Inc. · 2004
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 284 of its ownK042319 Reliant Laser II System and AccessoriesReliant Technologies, Inc. · 2005
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 259 of its ownK061652 Palomar LUX1540 HandpiecePalomar Medical Products, Inc. · 2007
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 230 of its ownK060310 Fraxel II SR Laser System and AccessoriesReliant Technologies, Inc. · 2006

Showing 5 of 318 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2003: 12004: 12005: 12006: 12007: 72008: 82009: 62010: 52011: 102012: 62013: 72014: 92015: 102016: 122017: 122018: 172019: 102020: 242021: 172022: 322023: 222024: 392025: 372026: 24
2003high 39 (2024) · low 1 (2003)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 318 · See all
  • K023734Aramis II Dermatological LaserQuantel Medical · 2003 · cites it directly317descendants
  • K040617Reliant Laser System IIReliant Technologies, Inc. · 2004 · 2 generations on316descendants
  • K042319Reliant Laser II System and AccessoriesReliant Technologies, Inc. · 2005 · 3 generations on284descendants
  • K061652Palomar LUX1540 HandpiecePalomar Medical Products, Inc. · 2007 · 4 generations on259descendants
  • K060310Fraxel II SR Laser System and AccessoriesReliant Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · 3 generations on230descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K012545Aramis Dermatlogic LaserLumedics, Ltd.2001—
+1K023734Aramis II Dermatological LaserQuantel Medical2003—
+2K040617Reliant Laser System IIReliant Technologies, Inc.2004—
+3K042319Reliant Laser II System and AccessoriesReliant Technologies, Inc.2005—
+4K061652Palomar LUX1540 HandpiecePalomar Medical Products, Inc.2007—
+3K060310Fraxel II SR Laser System and AccessoriesReliant Technologies, Inc.2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200410
200510
200610
200770
200880
200960
201050
2011100
201260
201370
201490
2015100
2016120
2017120
2018170
2019100
2020240
2021170
2022320
2023220
2024390
2025370
2026240
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K012545, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. Aramis Dermatologic Laser
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (318)

See all 318

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K023734Aramis II Dermatological LaserQuantel Medical2003317

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K023734 (Quantel Medical, 2003) has gone furthest, with 317 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Aramis Dermatologic Laser system is intended to be used for incision/excision, ablation, and coagulation (homeostasis) of soft tissue. The Aramis Laser is also indicated for the removal of pigmented lesions; photocoagulation of dermatological vascular lesions, including photothermolysis of blood vessels (treatment of facial and leg veins).

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K012545: Aramis Dermatlogic Laser.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K012545

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026