510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lightlance Laser Skin Perforator

K013021510(k) TraditionalCleared May 30, 2002265-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Innotech USA, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on May 30, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K983673 (Cell Robotics, Inc., 1999) and 1 other predicate after a 265-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 30, 2002
Review
265 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K981746 (1998). 2 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 other ancestor2018: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant clearedK981746 · Cell Robotics' Lasette · Cell Robotics, Inc. · 19981995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K981746 · Cell Robotics' Lasette · Cell Robotics, Inc. · 19980
  1. Root · 1 generation backK981746 Cell Robotics' LasetteCell Robotics, Inc. · 1998
  2. This deviceK013021 Lightlance Laser Skin PerforatorInnotech USA, Inc. · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK172818 LMT-3000Lameditech Co., Ltd. · 2018
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK241646 Ortiv (Ortiv-BL, Ortiv-WH)Mvitro Co., Ltd. · 2024

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K172818LMT-3000Lameditech Co., Ltd. · 2018 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K241646Ortiv (Ortiv-BL, Ortiv-WH)Mvitro Co., Ltd. · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K981746Cell Robotics' LasetteCell Robotics, Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K013021Lightlance Laser Skin PerforatorInnotech USA, Inc.2002—
+1K172818LMT-3000Lameditech Co., Ltd.2018—
+2K241646Ortiv (Ortiv-BL, Ortiv-WH)Mvitro Co., Ltd.2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201810
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013021, 1998–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K983673Lasette
Summary page 2
…§878.4810 Device Class: Class I 3. Substantial Equivalence: The LightLance™ Laser Skin Perforator substantially equivalent to the current, legally marketed LASETTE™ (k983673) and (k981746). The LightLance™ Laser Skin Perforator has the same intended use and general and specific indications as both of p…
Cell Robotics, Inc.1999—
*K981746Cell Robotics' Lasette
Summary page 2
…vice Class: Class I 3. Substantial Equivalence: The LightLance™ Laser Skin Perforator substantially equivalent to the current, legally marketed LASETTE™ (k983673) and (k981746). The LightLance™ Laser Skin Perforator has the same intended use and general and specific indications as both of predicated Lase…
Cell Robotics, Inc.1998—

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K172818LMT-3000Lameditech Co., Ltd.20181

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K172818 (Lameditech Co., Ltd., 2018) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The LightLance™ Laser Skin Perforator is intended to be used for ablation of skin tissue to establish capillary blood access. The LightLance™ Laser Skin Perforator general indication for use is for the perforation of skin to draw capillary blood for screening purposes. The device is specifically indicated for obtaining capillary blood samples for subsequent analysis of blood glucose concentration in both institutional and home settings

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013021: Lightlance Laser Skin Perforator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013021

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026