510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2014

Most Options System

K013031510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 7, 200188-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3510Recalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Dec 7, 2001 after an 88-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 6 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
Dec 7, 2001
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KRO
Recalls
3
Predicates
0

6 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2018: 2 descendants cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2021: 2 descendants cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK013031 Most Options SystemSulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · 2001
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK173057 Zimmer Knee Joint Replacement Prostheses MR LabelingZimmer, Inc. · 2018 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK181947 Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2018 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK191625 Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2019 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK243724 Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral…Zimmer, Inc. · 2025
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK210829 Persona Revision Knee System Femoral Metaphyseal ConesZimmer, Inc. · 2021

Showing 5 of 6 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2018: 22019: 12021: 22025: 1
2018high 2 (2018) · low 0 (2020)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 6 · See all
  • K173057Zimmer Knee Joint Replacement Prostheses MR LabelingZimmer, Inc. · 2018 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K181947Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2018 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K191625Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc. · 2019 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K243724Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral Components)Zimmer, Inc. · 2025 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K210829Persona Revision Knee System Femoral Metaphyseal ConesZimmer, Inc. · 2021 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K013031Most Options SystemSulzer Orthopedics, Inc.2001—
+1K173057Zimmer Knee Joint Replacement Prostheses MR LabelingZimmer, Inc.20182
+1K181947Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.20181
+1K191625Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.20191
+2K243724Persona® Revision Knee System (Persona Revision SoluTion™ Femoral Components)Zimmer, Inc.2025—
+2K210829Persona Revision Knee System Femoral Metaphyseal ConesZimmer, Inc.2021—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201820
201910
202120
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013031, 2001–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KRO device

  1. #1 K251665 Triathlon® Hinge Knee Systemscore 19.0 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Sulzer Orthopedics MOST™ System
Named without a submission number
—
*—Johnson & Johnson S-ROM® Noiles™ Rotating Hinge Knee System
Named without a submission number
—
*—Howmedica Osteonics® Modular Rotating Hinge Knee (MRS)
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (6)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K173057Zimmer Knee Joint Replacement Prostheses MR LabelingZimmer, Inc.20185
K181947Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.20184
K191625Persona Revision Knee SystemZimmer, Inc.20191

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 25, 2014Class IIZ-1250-2014StorageA complaint was received for a discolored All Poly Tibia. Root cause analysis found that the discoloration was the result of free radical oxidation. The oxidation process was advanced prematurely as a result of the machined component…
Jan 29, 2009Not classifiedZ-0996-2009Packaging process controlThe package contains 11 mm screws instead of the specified 6 mm screws.
Dec 17, 2004Not classifiedZ-0539-05OtherRisk of adapter disassociation from mating components when assembled improperly or when subjected to high-stress femoral applications.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K173057 (Zimmer, Inc., 2018) has gone furthest, with 5 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KRO devices

KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KRO

3in 2025

2007: 12008: 32009: 32010: 12011: 22012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 62016: 32017: 12019: 32020: 12021: 32022: 12023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2015) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KRO

56in 2025

2008: 126 days median2009: 86 days median2013: 189 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 148 days median2019: 244 days median2021: 57 days median2023: 148 days median2024: 87 days median2025: 56 days median
2007high 244 (2019) · low 56 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KRO

14so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12008: 32009: 82011: 12012: 12013: 22015: 12016: 52017: 42018: 12021: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 14
2007high 14 (2026) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KRO

915in 2025

2007: 372008: 442009: 662010: 1102011: 1192012: 1732013: 1942014: 4062015: 3332016: 3692017: 5432018: 6142019: 7592020: 7492021: 7702022: 8922023: 7462024: 8552025: 915
2007high 915 (2025) · low 37 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—137
20083126344
2009386866
20101—0110
20112—1119
20122—1173
201331892194
20142—0406
201561131333
201631485369
20171—4543
20180—1614
201932440759
20201—0749
20213571770
20221—0892
202341480746
20243870855
20253561915
20261—14—

What is it indicated for?

The MOST System is intended to replace the proximal, distal or total femur and/or the proximal tibia, especially in cases that require extensive resection and restoration. Replacement of the distal femur would also include replacement of the proximal tibia and possible resurfacing of the patella, if necessary. Proximal femoral replacement components are available for press-fit or cemented applications. Components used for replacement of the distal femur…

Read the full statement (161 words)

The MOST System is intended to replace the proximal, distal or total femur and/or

the proximal tibia, especially in cases that require extensive resection and

restoration. Replacement of the distal femur would also include replacement of the

proximal tibia and possible resurfacing of the patella, if necessary. Proximal femoral

replacement components are available for press-fit or cemented applications.

Components used for replacement of the distal femur and proximal tibia are

intended for cemented use only. Specific diagnostic indications for use of the MOST

include:

1. metastatic diseases (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell tumors,

bone tumors ) requiring extensive resection(s) and replacement(s) of the

proximal and/or distal femur and/or proximal tibia;

2. patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD),

e.g., avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis and inflammatory (1JD), e.g. rheumatoid

arthritis, requiring extensive resection(s) and replacement(s) of the proximal

and/or distal femur and/or proximal tibia; and

3. revision cases requiring resection(s) and replacement(s) of the proximal, distal

or total femur and/or proximal tibia.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013031: Most Options System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013031

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026