510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Medstar 100 Interferential Stimlator

K013082510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 16, 200163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.5890

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mednet Services, Inc. · LIH Interferential Current Therapy

Cleared on Nov 16, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K924961 (Hmp 4000, Inc., 1993) after a 63-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1993.

Decided
Nov 16, 2001
Review
63 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LIH
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K924961 (1993). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K924961 · HMP 4000 Interferential Stimulator · Hmp 4000, Inc. · 19931990199219941996199820002002
K924961 · HMP 4000 Interferential Stimulator · Hmp 4000, Inc. · 19930
  1. Root · 1 generation backK924961 HMP 4000 Interferential StimulatorHmp 4000, Inc. · 1993
  2. This deviceK013082 Medstar 100 Interferential StimlatorMednet Services, Inc. · 2001
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K924961HMP 4000 Interferential StimulatorHmp 4000, Inc.1993—
0 (this device)K013082Medstar 100 Interferential StimlatorMednet Services, Inc.2001—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013082, 1993–2001Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LIH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LIH device

  1. #1 K231575 Vecttor VT-300score 7.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K924961HMP 4000 Interferential Stimulator
Summary page 1
…rferential Stimulator COMMON NAME: Interferential Stimulator (LIH) CLASSIFICATION: Class II PRODUCT CODE: LIH PREDICATE DEVICE (S): HMP 4000 Interferential Stimulator (K924961) DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The MEDSTAR 100 is a DC battery powered device that generates small pulses of electric current. These small…
Hmp 4000, Inc.1993—

Also cleared against K924961: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K924961.

How does its category compare?

All LIH devices

LIH Interferential Current Therapy: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LIH

1in 2024

2007: 12009: 22010: 22011: 12012: 22019: 12021: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LIH

Too few LIH 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LIH

No recall names LIH since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LIH

1in 2025

2008: 142009: 32010: 22011: 12012: 12013: 12015: 12016: 12017: 12019: 12021: 12024: 12025: 1
2007high 14 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LIH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—014
20092—03
20102—02
20111—01
20122—01
20130—01
20140—00
20150—01
20160—01
20170—01
20180—00
20191—01
20200—00
20211—01
20220—00
20230—00
20241—01
20250—01
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The MEDSTAR 100 Interferential Stimulator should only be used under the supervision for adjunctive therapy in the treatment of medical diseases and conditions to relive pain. When used for pain relief, the standard indications for use are:

e symptomatic relief and management of chronic pain and/or

e an adjunctive treatment in the management of post surgical and posttraumatic acute pain.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013082: Medstar 100 Interferential Stimlator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013082

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026