510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Babycom

K013547510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 20, 2002119-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.2660

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Pmg Medica, Ltd. · KNG Monitor, Ultrasonic, Fetal

Cleared on Feb 20, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K930200 (Huntleigh Healthcare, Inc., 1994) after a 119-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994.

Decided
Feb 20, 2002
Review
119 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KNG
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K930200 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K930200 · Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex II · Huntleigh Healthcare, Inc. · 199419901992199419961998200020022004
  1. Root · 1 generation backK930200 Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex IIHuntleigh Healthcare, Inc. · 1994
  2. This deviceK013547 BabycomPmg Medica, Ltd. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K930200Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex IIHuntleigh Healthcare, Inc.1994—
0 (this device)K013547BabycomPmg Medica, Ltd.2002—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013547, 1994–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KNG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KNG device

  1. #1 K252669 Fetal Doppler U8-25, U9-25score 13.1 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K930200Multi Dopplex II / Fetal Dopplex II
Summary page 1
…Name of the Device: Babycom™. Predicate Devices: The Babycom™ is substantially equivalent to the Fetal Dopplex 11, manufactured by Huntco Healthcare, Inc. (subject of K930200). Description of the Device: The Babycom™ is a fetal ultrasonic heart rate monitor that is designed to transmit and receive ultr…
Huntleigh Healthcare, Inc.1994—

Also cleared against K930200: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K930200.

How does its category compare?

All KNG devices

KNG Monitor, Ultrasonic, Fetal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KNG

1in 2025

2008: 12009: 32010: 22011: 52014: 12015: 12016: 12018: 32019: 32021: 12022: 22024: 22025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KNG

202in 2019

2009: 181 days median2011: 57 days median2018: 154 days median2019: 202 days median
2007high 202 (2019) · low 57 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KNG

No recall names KNG since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KNG

1in 2025

2008: 22013: 12014: 12017: 32018: 82019: 12020: 22021: 12023: 22024: 32025: 1
2007high 8 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KNG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20081—02
2009318100
20102—00
201155700
20120—00
20130—01
20141—01
20151—00
20161—00
20170—03
2018315408
2019320201
20200—02
20211—01
20222—00
20230—02
20242—03
20251—01
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Babycom™ is meant to be applied to a woman's abdomen during pregnancy in order to measure the fetal heart rate (FHR) as a general indicator of fetal well-being.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013547: Babycom.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013547

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026