510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Acqplan 5.0

K013644510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 12, 2002311-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · MUJ System, Planning, Radiation Therapy Treatment

Cleared on Sep 12, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K974770 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 1998) after a 311-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Sep 12, 2002
Review
311 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MUJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K974770 (1998). 5 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2016: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2022: 2 descendants clearedK974770 · Acqplan · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 19981995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 2 descendants K974770 · Acqplan · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 19980
  1. Root · 1 generation backK974770 AcqplanPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1998
  2. This deviceK013644 Acqplan 5.0Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK151435 MRCATPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland · 2016
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK182888 MRCAT PelvisPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland · 2019
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK193109 MRCAT brainPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland · 2020
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK211841 MRI PlannerSpectronic Medical AB · 2022
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK214081 MRCAT Head & NeckPhilips OY · 2022

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K151435MRCATPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland · 2016 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K182888MRCAT PelvisPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland · 2019 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K193109MRCAT brainPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland · 2020 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K211841MRI PlannerSpectronic Medical AB · 2022 · 4 generations on0descendants
  • K214081MRCAT Head & NeckPhilips OY · 2022 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K974770AcqplanPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K013644Acqplan 5.0Philips Medical Systems, Inc.2002—
+1K151435MRCATPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland2016—
+2K182888MRCAT PelvisPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland2019—
+3K193109MRCAT brainPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland2020—
+4K211841MRI PlannerSpectronic Medical AB2022—
+4K214081MRCAT Head & NeckPhilips OY2022—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201610
201910
202010
202220
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013644, 1998–2022Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MUJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MUJ device

  1. #1 K232799 syngo.via RT Image Suitescore 18.6 · 19 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974770Acqplan
Summary page 1
…is of comparable type and substantially equivalent to the legally marketed device, AcQPlan currently in commercial distribution under 5 1O(k) Document control Number K974770. 19 4. Device Description The AcQPlan 5.0 provides three-dimension…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1998—

Also cleared against K974770: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (5)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K151435MRCATPhilips Medical Systems MR Finland20164

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K151435 (Philips Medical Systems MR Finland, 2016) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K974770.

How does its category compare?

All MUJ devices

MUJ System, Planning, Radiation Therapy Treatment: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MUJ

10in 2025

2007: 42008: 92009: 162010: 112011: 92012: 82013: 52014: 92015: 132016: 52017: 72018: 72019: 92020: 92021: 112022: 82023: 102024: 92025: 102026 (partial year): 9
2007high 16 (2009) · low 4 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MUJ

186in 2025

2007: 67 days median2008: 63 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 56 days median2011: 103 days median2012: 59 days median2013: 64 days median2014: 108 days median2015: 78 days median2016: 80 days median2017: 30 days median2018: 53 days median2019: 56 days median2020: 104 days median2021: 87 days median2022: 168 days median2023: 140 days median2024: 122 days median2025: 186 days median2026 (partial year): 233 days median
2007high 233 (2026) · low 30 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MUJ

2in 2023

2007: 42008: 102009: 112010: 232011: 172012: 42013: 62014: 22015: 72016: 132017: 42018: 32019: 42020: 22021: 42022: 32023: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 23 (2010) · low 0 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MUJ

21in 2025

2007: 242008: 512009: 242010: 782011: 732012: 392013: 332014: 352015: 302016: 272017: 162018: 252019: 252020: 262021: 152022: 222023: 762024: 92025: 21
2007high 78 (2010) · low 9 (2024)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MUJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007467424
20089631051
200916841124
201011562378
201191031773
2012859439
2013564633
20149108235
20151378730
20165801327
2017730416
2018753325
2019956425
20209104226
20211187415
20228168322
202310140276
2024912209
202510186021
202692332—

What is it indicated for?

The AcQPlan 5.0 is an integrated 3-D RTP and simulation system embedded in a volumetric image processing computer environment. AcQPlan 5.0 is intended to be used to plan radiation therapy treatments on linear accelerators and other similar teletherapy devices with x-ray beams of energies from 4 to 50 MV, cobalt-60, and electron beams with energies from 4 to 50 MeV of the entire human anatomy. It allows the treatment planner to employ such techniques as…

Read the full statement (240 words)

The AcQPlan 5.0 is an integrated 3-D RTP and simulation system embedded in a volumetric image processing computer environment. AcQPlan 5.0 is intended to be used to plan radiation therapy treatments on linear accelerators and other similar teletherapy devices with x-ray beams of energies from 4 to 50 MV, cobalt-60, and electron beams with energies from 4 to 50 MeV of the entire human anatomy. It allows the treatment planner to employ such techniques as asymmetrically collimated fields, irregular fields, multi-leaf collimators, non-coplanar fields, bolus, and fixed wedges. It allows the treatment planner to take heterogeneities into account (CT only) for photon beams using two versions of the Batho method or the Equivalent TAR (ETAR) method, and it uses a generalized Gaussian pencil beam model for electron beams. Using AcQPlan 5 .O, the treatment planner can simultaneously visualize target and normal tissues and the computed 3-D dose distributions in great detail, on a real-time basis. The treatment planner develops treatment plans in a coordinate system accurately fixed to set-up marks on the patient made possible by volumetric 3-D image processing. Tools for managing competing and complementary plans are provided. Tools, based on DVH plots, are provided for comparing competing plans. High quality DRS and DCS (digitally reconstructed or composited simulation) images, with BEV and beam graphics superimposed, are generated to replace conventional simulator films. This device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, components and accessories.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013644: Acqplan 5.0.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013644

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026