510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Arm Automatic Reprocessing Machine

K013713510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 15, 2002249-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5820

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Alcavis International Incorporated · LIF Dialyzer Reprocessing System

Cleared on Jul 15, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K860674 (Seratronics, Inc., 1986) after a 249-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1986.

Decided
Jul 15, 2002
Review
249 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LIF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K860674 (1986). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K860674 · DRS-4 Dialyzer Reprocessing System · Seratronics, Inc. · 19861985199019952000
  1. Root · 1 generation backK860674 DRS-4 Dialyzer Reprocessing SystemSeratronics, Inc. · 1986
  2. This deviceK013713 Arm Automatic Reprocessing MachineAlcavis International Incorporated · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K860674DRS-4 Dialyzer Reprocessing SystemSeratronics, Inc.1986—
0 (this device)K013713Arm Automatic Reprocessing MachineAlcavis International Incorporated2002—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013713, 1986–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LIF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K860674DRS-4 Dialyzer Reprocessing System
Summary page 1
…tem, panel 78, procode LIF, unclassified Legally Marketed Device claiming Substantial Equivalence to, §807.92(a)(3): Seratronic DRS-4 Dialyzer Reprocessing System, K860674 Description of Device, $807.92(a)(4): The Amuchina ARM Automatic [Dialyzer] Reprocessing Machine is a stand alone device…
Seratronics, Inc.1986—

Also cleared against K860674: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K860674.

How does its category compare?

All LIF devices

LIF Dialyzer Reprocessing System: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LIF

1in 2010

2010: 1
2007high 1 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LIF

Too few LIF 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LIF

1in 2009

2009: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LIF

1in 2017

2007: 32008: 12014: 12017: 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LIF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—03
20080—01
20090—10
20101—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Amuchina Automatic Reprocessing Machine (ARM) is a device designed for both (a) reprocessing hemodialyzers for reuse, and (b) preprocessing hemodialyzers prior to first use. Reprocessed hemodialyzer will be reused on the same patient on who originally used the hemodialyzer. Both the reprocessing and preprocessing procedures use peracetic acid/hydrogen peroxide based disinfectant.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013713: Arm Automatic Reprocessing Machine.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013713

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026