510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Gelzone

K013732510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 7, 200290-day reviewClass I21 CFR 878.4025

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Implantech Associates, Inc. · MDA Elastomer, Silicone, For Scar Management

Cleared on Feb 7, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K964846 (Implantech Associates, Inc., 1997) and 2 other predicates after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1997.

Decided
Feb 7, 2002
Review
90 days
Class
Class I
Product code
MDA
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K964846 (1997). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestorK964846 · Implatech RP Medical Grade Silicone Gel Sheeting · Implantech Associates, Inc. · 199719961998200020022004
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors K964846 · Implatech RP Medical Grade Silicone Gel Sheeting · Implantech Associates, Inc. · 19970
  1. Root · 1 generation backK964846 Implatech RP Medical Grade Silicone Gel SheetingImplantech Associates, Inc. · 1997
  2. This deviceK013732 GelzoneImplantech Associates, Inc. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K964846Implatech RP Medical Grade Silicone Gel SheetingImplantech Associates, Inc.1997—
0 (this device)K013732GelzoneImplantech Associates, Inc.2002—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
200110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013732, 1997–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MDA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K964846Implatech RP Medical Grade Silicone Gel Sheeting
Summary page 1
…ard the formation of such scars. Substantial Equivalence Gelzone is substantially equivalent to the Implantech’s Gel Sheeting and Conform Sheeting cleared under 510(k) K964846 and K012419 respectively. Gelzone is also substantially equivalent to PMT’s Amend™ Silicone Gel Sheeting cleared under 510(k) num…
Implantech Associates, Inc.1997—
*K012419Conform Sheeting, Model Igel
Summary page 1
…ation of such scars. Substantial Equivalence Gelzone is substantially equivalent to the Implantech’s Gel Sheeting and Conform Sheeting cleared under 510(k) K964846 and K012419 respectively. Gelzone is also substantially equivalent to PMT’s Amend™ Silicone Gel Sheeting cleared under 510(k) number K972597.…
Implantech Associates, Inc.2001—
*K972597PMT New Beginnings Gelshapes & Amend
Summary page 1
…heeting cleared under 510(k) K964846 and K012419 respectively. Gelzone is also substantially equivalent to PMT’s Amend™ Silicone Gel Sheeting cleared under 510(k) number K972597. Exhibit I, Page 1 of 2 Kp1373% Page 2:.€2 Packaging and Labeling Gelzone will be provided in various lengths,…
Pmt Corp.1997—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All MDA devices

MDA Elastomer, Silicone, For Scar Management: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MDA

2in 2011

2009: 12011: 2
2007high 2 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MDA

Too few MDA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MDA

No recall names MDA since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · MDA

3in 2025

2007: 32013: 22014: 12015: 22016: 52017: 32018: 22019: 52020: 42021: 32023: 82025: 3
2007high 8 (2023) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MDA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—03
20080—00
20091—00
20100—00
20112—00
20120—00
20130—02
20140—01
20150—02
20160—05
20170—03
20180—02
20190—05
20200—04
20210—03
20220—00
20230—08
20240—00
20250—03
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Gelzone is indicated for use in the management of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Gelzone may also be used prophylactically to help retard the formation of such scars.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013732: Gelzone.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013732

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026