510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Distraction Osteogenesis Rod Appliances, Models 1, 2, and 3

K014001510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 4, 2003427-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.4760

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Oral Osteodistraction, L.P. · MQN External Mandibular Fixator And/Or Distractor

Cleared on Feb 4, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K973275 (KLS-Martin L.P., 1997) and 1 other predicate after a 427-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1979. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 4, 2003
Review
427 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MQN
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K792561 (1979). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2004: 1 descendant clearedK792561 · Mini-H-Fixation · Geny Medical, Inc. · 1979K962272 · Synthes Mandible Distractor · Synthes (Usa) · 1996K973275 · KLS-Martin Intraoral Distractor · KLS-Martin L.P. · 199719801990200020102020
  1. Root · 3 generations backK792561 Mini-H-FixationGeny Medical, Inc. · 1979
  2. 2 generations backK962272 Synthes Mandible DistractorSynthes (Usa) · 1996
  3. 1 generation backK973275 KLS-Martin Intraoral DistractorKLS-Martin L.P. · 1997
  4. This deviceK014001 Distraction Osteogenesis Rod Appliances, Models 1, 2, and 3Oral Osteodistraction, L.P. · 2003
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK034045 Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances, Rod 4Oral Osteodistraction, L.P. · 2004

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K034045Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances, Rod 4Oral Osteodistraction, L.P. · 2004 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K792561Mini-H-FixationGeny Medical, Inc.1979—
−2K962272Synthes Mandible DistractorSynthes (Usa)1996—
−1K973275KLS-Martin Intraoral DistractorKLS-Martin L.P.1997—
0 (this device)K014001Distraction Osteogenesis Rod Appliances, Models 1, 2, and 3Oral Osteodistraction, L.P.2003—
+1K034045Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances, Rod 4Oral Osteodistraction, L.P.2004—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K014001, 1979–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MQN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MQN device

  1. #1 K220050 KLS Martin IPS Distractionscore 5.0 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K973275KLS-Martin Intraoral Distractor
Summary page 1
…and Rod 3) Classification Name: External Mandibular Fixator and/or Distractor Predicate Device: KLS-Martin Intraoral Distractor K973275 Synthes Mandibular Distractor K962272 Intended Use: The Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances…
KLS-Martin L.P.1997—
*K962272Synthes Mandible Distractor
Summary page 1
…l Mandibular Fixator and/or Distractor Predicate Device: KLS-Martin Intraoral Distractor K973275 Synthes Mandibular Distractor K962272 Intended Use: The Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances is intended to be used in the mandible for conditions such…
Synthes (Usa)1996—

Also cleared against K973275: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K034045Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances, Rod 4Oral Osteodistraction, L.P.20040

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.2 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K034045 (Oral Osteodistraction, L.P., 2004) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K973275.

How does its category compare?

All MQN devices

MQN External Mandibular Fixator And/Or Distractor: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MQN

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 32012: 12014: 12015: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12022: 1
2007high 4 (2007) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MQN

292in 2008

2007: 77 days median2008: 292 days median
2007high 292 (2008) · low 77 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MQN

1in 2014

2014: 1
2007high 1 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MQN

34in 2025

2007: 52008: 82009: 112010: 202011: 262012: 1072013: 1792014: 572015: 932016: 872017: 752018: 1082019: 1222020: 862021: 1012022: 612023: 392024: 602025: 34
2007high 179 (2013) · low 5 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MQN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200747705
2008329208
20090—011
20100—020
20110—026
20121—0107
20130—0179
20141—157
20151—093
20161—087
20171—075
20181—0108
20191—0122
20200—086
20210—0101
20221—061
20230—039
20240—060
20250—034
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Oral Osteodistraction Distraction Rod Appliances is intended to be used in the mandible for conditions such as mandibular deficiency or post-traumatic effects of the mandible, where gradual bone distraction is required.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K014001: Distraction Osteogenesis Rod Appliances, Models 1, 2, and 3.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K014001

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026