510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lifesign THC, Status Stik THC, Accusign Stik THC, Lifesign Marijuana, Accustik THC

K014066510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 10, 2002182-day reviewClass II21 CFR 862.3870

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Princeton BioMeditech Corp. · LDJ Enzyme Immunoassay, Cannabinoids

Cleared on Jun 10, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K990786 (Princeton BioMeditech Corp., 1999) after a 182-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1999.

Decided
Jun 10, 2002
Review
182 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LDJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K990786 (1999). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK990786 Accusign Doa 10, Accusign Doa 10 Panel, Acusign…Princeton BioMeditech Corp. · 1999
  2. This deviceK014066 Lifesign THC, Status Stik THC, Accusign Stik THC, Lifesign…Princeton BioMeditech Corp. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K990786Accusign Doa 10, Accusign Doa 10 Panel, Acusign…Princeton BioMeditech Corp.1999—
0 (this device)K014066Lifesign THC, Status Stik THC, Accusign Stik THC, Lifesign Marijuana, Accustik…Princeton BioMeditech Corp.2002—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K014066, 1999–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LDJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LDJ device

  1. #1 K232732 Rapid Marijuana (THC) Test Strip 20, Rapid…score 9.4 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990786Accusign Doa 10, Accusign Doa 10 Panel, Acusign Met/Opi/Coc/THC/PCP/Bzo/Bar/MTD/Tca/Amp…
Summary page 1
…lysis Systems, Toxicology (91DKE for Enzyme Immunoassay) 4. Identification of legally marketed device to which claims equivalence: k990786 status DS'%OA I o (MET/OPI/COC/THC/PCP/BZO/BARMTD/TCNAMP) 5. Device Description: Status Stikm THC is simple one…
Princeton BioMeditech Corp.1999—

Also cleared against K990786: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K990786.

How does its category compare?

All LDJ devices

LDJ Enzyme Immunoassay, Cannabinoids: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LDJ

2in 2024

2008: 22009: 12011: 42012: 42013: 32014: 22015: 32016: 12019: 12023: 12024: 2
2007high 4 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LDJ

48in 2015

2011: 219 days median2012: 193 days median2013: 162 days median2015: 48 days median
2007high 219 (2011) · low 48 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LDJ

1in 2023

2008: 42023: 1
2007high 4 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LDJ

1in 2015

2015: 1
2007high 1 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LDJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20082—40
20091—00
20100—00
2011421900
2012419300
2013316200
20142—00
201534801
20161—00
20170—00
20180—00
20191—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20231—10
20242—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Immunoassay for the qualitative detection of THC metabolite, 11-nor-A9-THC-9-carboxylic acid, at the cut-off of 50 ng/rnL in urine to assist in screening of drugs of abuse samples at home. For In vitro Diagnostic Use

Immunoassay for the qualitative detection of THC metabolite, 11-nor-A9-THC-9-carboxylic acid, at the cut-off of 50 nglmL in urine to assist in screening of drugs of abuse samples. For In vitro Diagnostic Use

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K014066: Lifesign THC, Status Stik THC, Accusign Stik THC, Lifesign Marijuana, Accustik THC.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K014066

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026