510(k) · Cleared
ClearedErecaid Classic System; Erecaid Esteem Manual System; Erecaid Esteem Battery System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Endocare, Inc. · LKY Device, External Penile Rigidity
Cleared on Feb 5, 2002 after a 26-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number.
- Decided
- Feb 5, 2002
- Review
- 26 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LKY
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
The FDA summary names no predicate by number.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LKY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against?
The FDA summary names no predicate by number.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All LKY devicesLKY Device, External Penile Rigidity: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LKY
FDA has decided no LKY device since 2007.
Median 510(k) review, days · LKY
Too few LKY 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · LKY
No recall names LKY since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · LKY
2in 2023
MAUDE reports naming product code LKY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Classic and Esteem vacuum systems are intended to artificially produce an erection in males suffering from erectile dysfunction (impotence) in order to facilitate sexual intercourse. A vacuum is applied to the penis, causing it to become erect and rigid as blood is drawn into the corpora cavernosa. A constriction ring is then placed on the base of the penis to restrict venous blood flow out of the penis. The device is intended to be used at home or in a doctor’s office or clinic.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K020082 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K020082: Erecaid Classic System; Erecaid Esteem Manual System; Erecaid Esteem Battery System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K020082
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026