510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Depilase Yag Lase Plus Laser System

K020463510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 27, 200215-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Depilase Group, Ltd. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Feb 27, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K990718 (Laserscope, 2000) and 1 other predicate after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1996. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Feb 27, 2002
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K963094 (1996). 12 ancestors in all, the oldest K950019 (1995). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor1997: 4 other ancestors1996: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 descendant clearedK963094 · Cynosure Photogenica LP Dermatological Vascular Lesion Laser · Cynosure, Inc. · 1996×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K972767 (1997), K974381 (1998) K981351 · Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological Laser · Candela Corp. · 1998K991798 · Acme Medical Aesthetic ND:Yag Laser · Altus Medical · 20001995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 2 other ancestors3 generations back: 2 other ancestors4 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K991798 · Acme Medical Aesthetic ND:Yag Laser · Altus Medical · 2000K981351 · Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological Laser · Candela Corp. · 1998K974381 · Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological Laser · Candela Corp. · 1998K972767 · Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological Vascular Lesion Laser · Candela Corp. · 1997 · recalledK963094 · Cynosure Photogenica LP Dermatological Vascular Lesion Laser · Cynosure, Inc. · 1996−50
  1. Root · 5 generations backK963094 Cynosure Photogenica LP Dermatological Vascular Lesion LaserCynosure, Inc. · 1996
  2. 4 generations backK972767 Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological Vascular Lesion LaserCandela Corp. · 1997 · Recalled
  3. 3 generations backK974381 Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological LaserCandela Corp. · 1998
  4. 2 generations backK981351 Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological LaserCandela Corp. · 1998
  5. 1 generation backK991798 Acme Medical Aesthetic ND:Yag LaserAltus Medical · 2000
  6. This deviceK020463 Depilase Yag Lase Plus Laser SystemDepilase Group, Ltd. · 2002
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK021650 Athoscan for the Athos Laser Constans Cooling Hand Piece for the…Quantel Medical · 2002

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K021650Athoscan for the Athos Laser Constans Cooling Hand Piece for the Athos LaserQuantel Medical · 2002 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K963094Cynosure Photogenica LP Dermatological Vascular Lesion LaserCynosure, Inc.1996—
−4K972767Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological Vascular Lesion LaserCandela Corp.19971
−3K974381Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological LaserCandela Corp.1998—
−2K981351Candela Gentlelase GL Dermatological LaserCandela Corp.1998—
−1K991798Acme Medical Aesthetic ND:Yag LaserAltus Medical2000—
0 (this device)K020463Depilase Yag Lase Plus Laser SystemDepilase Group, Ltd.2002—
+1K021650Athoscan for the Athos Laser Constans Cooling Hand Piece for the Athos LaserQuantel Medical2002—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
199610
199740
200010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K020463, 1996–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K990718Orion Series Surgical Laser System (SL Seriesq-Switched ND:Yag Configuration)
Summary page 2
…d skin types. H1. Summary of Substantial Equivalence Depilase believes that its DEPILASE YAG LASE PLUS Laser System is substantially equivalent to the Laserscope Lyra (K990718), and Altus Medical Aesthetic CoolGlide (K991798) Nd: YAG lasers, previously cleared for both the coagulation and haemostasis of…
Laserscope2000—
*K991798Acme Medical Aesthetic ND:Yag Laser
Summary page 2
…ence Depilase believes that its DEPILASE YAG LASE PLUS Laser System is substantially equivalent to the Laserscope Lyra (K990718), and Altus Medical Aesthetic CoolGlide (K991798) Nd: YAG lasers, previously cleared for both the coagulation and haemostasis of vascular lesions and the removal and permanent re…
Altus Medical2000—

Also cleared against K990718: 5 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K021650Athoscan for the Athos Laser Constans Cooling Hand Piece for the Athos LaserQuantel Medical20020

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 12 months on median.
  • 1 of the 12 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K021650 (Quantel Medical, 2002) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K990718.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The DEPILASE YAG LASE PLUS Laser System is intended for the coagulation and

haemostasis of vascular lesions and the removal and permanent reduction of unwanted hair in

Fitzpatrick skin types I —VI, including suntanned skin types.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K020463: Depilase Yag Lase Plus Laser System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K020463

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026