510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2004

Patientnet Monitoring System

K020524510(k) SpecialCleared Mar 20, 200229-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2300Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

General Electric Medical Systems Information Techn · MSX System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors

Cleared on Mar 20, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K962473 (Data Critical Corporation, 1997) after a 29-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1990. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Mar 20, 2002
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MSX
Recalls
1
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K903702 (1990). 4 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor2003: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant clearedK903702 · Model 90421 Flexport Interface · Spacelabs, Inc. · 1990 · recalledK962473 · (Vcom, Irvs, RVS) Central Monitoring Station, V-Link or Ambulatory Transmitters and Arrhytmia Detector and Alarms with · Data Critical Corporation · 19971990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant K962473 · (Vcom, Irvs, RVS) Central Monitoring Station, V-Link or Ambulatory Transmitters and Arrhytmia Detector and Alarms with · Data Critical Corporation · 1997K903702 · Model 90421 Flexport Interface · Spacelabs, Inc. · 1990 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK903702 Model 90421 Flexport InterfaceSpacelabs, Inc. · 1990 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK962473 (Vcom, Irvs, RVS) Central Monitoring Station, V-Link or Ambulatory…Data Critical Corporation · 1997
  3. This deviceK020524 Patientnet Monitoring SystemGeneral Electric Medical Systems Information Techn · 2002
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK031760 Viewpoint Telemetry SystemDatascope Corp. · 2003 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK142601 Panorama Patient Monitoring NetworkShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. · 2014 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK150082 Panorama Patient Monitoring NetworkShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. · 2015 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K031760Viewpoint Telemetry SystemDatascope Corp. · 2003 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K142601Panorama Patient Monitoring NetworkShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. · 2014 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K150082Panorama Patient Monitoring NetworkShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. · 2015 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K903702Model 90421 Flexport InterfaceSpacelabs, Inc.19901
−1K962473(Vcom, Irvs, RVS) Central Monitoring Station, V-Link or Ambulatory…Data Critical Corporation1997—
0 (this device)K020524Patientnet Monitoring SystemGeneral Electric Medical Systems Information Techn2002—
+1K031760Viewpoint Telemetry SystemDatascope Corp.20035
+2K142601Panorama Patient Monitoring NetworkShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co.20141
+3K150082Panorama Patient Monitoring NetworkShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.20151

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
199510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
201410
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K020524, 1990–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MSX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MSX device

  1. #1 K242750 Central Stationscore 21.5 · 31 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K962473(Vcom, Irvs, RVS) Central Monitoring Station, V-Link or Ambulatory Transmitters and…
Summary page 1
…lassification Name: System, Network and Communication, Physiological Monitors Device Classification: Class Il Predicate Device(s): VitalCom Networked Monitoring System K962473 Device Description: The modified PatientNet™ Monitoring System performs patient monitoring using PatientNet™ ambulatory radio t…
Data Critical Corporation1997—

Also cleared against K962473: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K031760Viewpoint Telemetry SystemDatascope Corp.20032

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 27, 2004Not classifiedZ-0727-04OtherNon-invasive blood pressure readings on central station may not match bedside monitor due to software anomaly.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.0 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K031760 (Datascope Corp., 2003) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K962473.

How does its category compare?

All MSX devices

MSX System, Network And Communication, Physiological Monitors: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MSX

4in 2025

2007: 42008: 12009: 12010: 32011: 72012: 42013: 22014: 32015: 52016: 32017: 22018: 42019: 42020: 52021: 32022: 52023: 32024: 42025: 42026 (partial year): 5
2007high 7 (2011) · low 1 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MSX

295in 2025

2007: 58 days median2010: 43 days median2011: 72 days median2012: 145 days median2014: 165 days median2015: 138 days median2016: 174 days median2018: 111 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 193 days median2021: 227 days median2022: 177 days median2023: 244 days median2024: 212 days median2025: 295 days median2026 (partial year): 145 days median
2007high 295 (2025) · low 43 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MSX

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 12009: 22010: 12011: 12012: 22015: 22017: 22018: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MSX

19in 2025

2007: 52008: 62009: 72010: 142011: 32012: 42013: 172014: 322015: 312016: 112017: 162018: 152019: 152020: 252021: 172022: 182023: 102024: 322025: 19
2007high 32 (2014) · low 3 (2011)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MSX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200745815
20081—16
20091—27
2010343114
201177213
2012414524
20132—017
20143165032
20155138231
20163174011
20172—216
20184111115
2019492015
20205193025
20213227017
20225177118
20233244010
20244212032
20254295119
202651452—

What is it indicated for?

Monitoring of Recognized Conditions: -An environmentally controlled clinical setting that has multiple patients using any combination of ECG leads, bedside monitors, or ventilators. -Hospital areas that have the capability of installing hardwire paths to the Central Monitoring Station from the rooms or areas where bedside monitors or ventilators operate. -Clinical areas that have the capability of installing 174-216 MHz radio systems (or alternate…

Read the full statement (113 words)

Monitoring of Recognized Conditions:

-An environmentally controlled clinical setting that has multiple patients using any combination of ECG leads, bedside monitors, or ventilators.

-Hospital areas that have the capability of installing hardwire paths to the Central Monitoring Station from the rooms or areas where bedside monitors or ventilators operate.

-Clinical areas that have the capability of installing 174-216 MHz radio systems (or alternate frequency bands approved by the FCC) to communicate via RF. The information from the ECG leads, bedside monitors or ventilators is transferred via an RF transmitter to the Central Monitoring Station.

Target Population:

Those patients who are connected through PatientNet™ Monitoring System via ambulatory ECG transmitters, bedside monitors, or ventilators.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K020524: Patientnet Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K020524

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026