510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2008

Medstar System, Models 533-300

K020534510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 11, 2003357-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2920Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cybernet Medical · DXH Transmitters And Receivers, Electrocardiograph, Telephone

Cleared on Feb 11, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K010029 (Avid Care Corp., 2001) and 2 other predicates after a 357-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992. 10 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Feb 11, 2003
Review
357 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DXH
Recalls
4
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K915632 (1992). 3 ancestors in all. 10 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor2005: 2 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant clearedK915632 · Paceart CPTS-86/12 · Paceart, Inc. · 19921990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 3 descendants2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 3 descendants4 generations forward: 1 descendant K915632 · Paceart CPTS-86/12 · Paceart, Inc. · 19920
  1. Root · 1 generation backK915632 Paceart CPTS-86/12Paceart, Inc. · 1992
  2. This deviceK020534 Medstar System, Models 533-300Cybernet Medical · 2003
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 8 of its ownK041854 MPM SystemAerotel Medical Systems, Ltd. · 2004
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK051544 Vitalcaregiving SystemAdvanced Monitoring Caregiving, Inc. · 2005
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK063008 Health Check KioskXperex Corporation · 2007
  6. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK151839 AMC Health VitalCaregiving SystemAmc Health · 2016
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK101198 Csi Managed Health System Model: Csi Model 9KComputerized Screening, Inc. · 2010

Showing 5 of 10 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12005: 22007: 12010: 12012: 12015: 12016: 12017: 12024: 1
2004high 2 (2005) · low 0 (2006)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 10 · See all
  • K041854MPM SystemAerotel Medical Systems, Ltd. · 2004 · cites it directly8descendants
  • K051544Vitalcaregiving SystemAdvanced Monitoring Caregiving, Inc. · 2005 · cites it directly7descendants
  • K063008Health Check KioskXperex Corporation · 2007 · 2 generations on4descendants
  • K151839AMC Health VitalCaregiving SystemAmc Health · 2016 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K101198Csi Managed Health System Model: Csi Model 9KComputerized Screening, Inc. · 2010 · 3 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K915632Paceart CPTS-86/12Paceart, Inc.1992—
0 (this device)K020534Medstar System, Models 533-300Cybernet Medical2003—
+1K041854MPM SystemAerotel Medical Systems, Ltd.2004—
+1K051544Vitalcaregiving SystemAdvanced Monitoring Caregiving, Inc.2005—
+2K063008Health Check KioskXperex Corporation2007—
+2K151839AMC Health VitalCaregiving SystemAmc Health2016—
+3K101198Csi Managed Health System Model: Csi Model 9KComputerized Screening, Inc.2010—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200010
200110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200520
200710
201010
201210
201510
201610
201710
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K020534, 1992–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DXH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DXH device

  1. #1 K243438 MEMO Patch M (MPT-E08R-UNC01)score 12.9 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K010029Home Health Monitoring SystemAvid Care Corp.2001—
*K003257EHC400 Desktop Patient Station; ECH600 Care Provider StationCybercare Technologies, Inc.2000—
*K915632Paceart CPTS-86/12
Summary page 1
…AvidCare Corp., KO10029 Model EHC 400 Desktop Patient Station, Cybercare Technologies Inc., KO03257 PaceArt Central Station CPTS 86-12, PaceArt Inc., K915632 Section 16.e Device Description & Technological Characteristics The MedStar Monitoring System comprises the MedStar…
Paceart, Inc.1992—

Also cleared against K010029: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (10)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K041854MPM SystemAerotel Medical Systems, Ltd.20048
K051544Vitalcaregiving SystemAdvanced Monitoring Caregiving, Inc.20057
K050951Medstar 220, Model 533-220; Medstar 230, Model 533-230; Medstar 360, Model 533-360…Cibernet Systems Corp.20050

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 23, 2008Not classifiedZ-0854-2010Component design/selectionA software problem renders these devices incapable of capturing lung function, oxygen saturation and pulse data collected from multiple tests in accordance with the instructions for use.
Jan 23, 2008Not classifiedZ-0855-2010Component design/selectionA software problem renders these devices incapable of capturing lung function, oxygen saturation and pulse data collected from multiple tests in accordance with the instructions for use.
Jan 23, 2008Not classifiedZ-0852-2010Component design/selectionA software problem renders these devices incapable of capturing lung function, oxygen saturation and pulse data collected from multiple tests in accordance with the instructions for use.
Jan 23, 2008Not classifiedZ-0853-2010Component design/selectionA software problem renders these devices incapable of capturing lung function, oxygen saturation and pulse data collected from multiple tests in accordance with the instructions for use.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K041854 (Aerotel Medical Systems, Ltd., 2004) has gone furthest, with 8 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K010029.

How does its category compare?

All DXH devices

DXH Transmitters And Receivers, Electrocardiograph, Telephone: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DXH

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 72009: 22010: 22012: 12013: 32014: 62015: 42016: 12017: 52018: 42019: 62020: 52021: 32022: 42023: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 7 (2008) · low 0 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DXH

322in 2025

2007: 202 days median2008: 41 days median2013: 206 days median2014: 186 days median2015: 142 days median2017: 150 days median2018: 294 days median2019: 177 days median2020: 141 days median2021: 107 days median2022: 150 days median2025: 322 days median
2007high 322 (2025) · low 41 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DXH

1in 2015

2008: 42011: 32015: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 4 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DXH

27in 2025

2009: 12010: 42011: 12012: 12013: 12014: 12016: 52017: 42020: 52021: 22022: 62023: 42024: 22025: 27
2007high 27 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DXH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007320200
200874140
20092—01
20102—04
20110—31
20121—01
2013320601
2014618601
2015414210
20161—05
2017515004
2018429400
2019617700
2020514105
2021310702
2022415006
20231—04
20240—02
20254322027
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The MedStar System is indicated for Out-of-Hospital Use with any patient requiring Out-of-Hospital monitoring The associated Collection Server is intended for use in a Disease Management Center, Hospital or Hospital -Type facility, Medical Clinic or Physician’s Office.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K020534: Medstar System, Models 533-300.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K020534

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026