510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Modification to TSRH Spinal System

K021106510(k) SpecialCleared May 3, 200228-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation

Cleared on May 3, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K014076 (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 2001) after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2001. 37 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 3, 2002
Review
28 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MNI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K014076 (2001). 37 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2015: 4 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2014: 4 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2024: 7 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2016: 3 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2023: 3 descendants cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant clearedK014076 · Modification to TSRH Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2001200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 2 descendants4 generations forward: 2 descendants5 generations forward: 4 descendants6 generations forward: 7 descendants7 generations forward: 8 descendants8 generations forward: 6 descendants9 generations forward: 4 descendants10 generations forward: 2 descendants K014076 · Modification to TSRH Spinal System · Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 20010+5+10
  1. Root · 1 generation backK014076 Modification to TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2001
  2. This deviceK021106 Modification to TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2002
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 36 of its ownK110676 TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2011
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 35 of its ownK120899 Range Spinal System, Unit RodK2m, Inc. · 2012
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 34 of its ownK131030 Range Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2013
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 33 of its ownK133944 Range, Spinal System, Everest Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2014
  7. Descendant · 5 generations on · 30 of its ownK141873 Range/Mesa/Denali Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2014

Showing 5 of 37 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2011: 12012: 12013: 12014: 42015: 42016: 32017: 22018: 52020: 12021: 12022: 22023: 32024: 72026: 2
2011high 7 (2024) · low 0 (2019)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 37 · See all
  • K110676TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2011 · cites it directly36descendants
  • K120899Range Spinal System, Unit RodK2m, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on35descendants
  • K131030Range Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2013 · 3 generations on34descendants
  • K133944Range, Spinal System, Everest Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2014 · 4 generations on33descendants
  • K141873Range/Mesa/Denali Spinal SystemK2m, Inc. · 2014 · 5 generations on30descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K014076Modification to TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2001—
0 (this device)K021106Modification to TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2002—
+1K110676TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2011—
+2K120899Range Spinal System, Unit RodK2m, Inc.2012—
+3K131030Range Spinal SystemK2m, Inc.2013—
+4K133944Range, Spinal System, Everest Spinal SystemK2m, Inc.2014—
+5K141873Range/Mesa/Denali Spinal SystemK2m, Inc.2014—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
201210
201310
201440
201540
201630
201720
201850
202010
202110
202220
202330
202470
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021106, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MNI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K014076Modification to TSRH Spinal System
Summary page 1
…m III. Description 7 The purpose of this Special 510(k) is to add the use of rods which are physically identical to the rods already cleared in the TSRH® Spinal System (K014076). The TSRH® Spinal System consists of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods, hooks, screws, cross connectors, and connecting com…
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.2001—

What descends from it? (37)

See all 37

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K110676TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek201136

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K110676 (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2011) has gone furthest, with 36 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MNI devices

MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MNI

1in 2017

2007: 202008: 232009: 182010: 162011: 172012: 192013: 142014: 62015: 122016: 72017: 1
2007high 23 (2008) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MNI

168in 2016

2007: 82 days median2008: 64 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 111 days median2012: 75 days median2013: 77 days median2014: 104 days median2015: 54 days median2016: 168 days median
2007high 168 (2016) · low 54 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MNI

1in 2018

2007: 262008: 82009: 32010: 12012: 12013: 42015: 12018: 1
2007high 26 (2007) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MNI

80in 2025

2007: 832008: 1082009: 1382010: 1262011: 1462012: 2002013: 8242014: 3012015: 2602016: 1172017: 2472018: 1342019: 1882020: 1152021: 2702022: 2142023: 1222024: 1142025: 80
2007high 824 (2013) · low 80 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MNI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200720822683
200823648108
200918863138
201016741126
2011171110146
201219751200
201314774824
201461040301
201512541260
201671680117
20171—0247
20180—1134
20190—0188
20200—0115
20210—0270
20220—0214
20230—0122
20240—0114
20250—080
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally mature patients, the TSRH® Spinal System is indicated for one or more of the following: (1) degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, (2) fracture, (3) dislocation, (4) scoliosis, (5) kyphosis, (6) spinal tumor, and/or (7) failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). In addition, when used as a pedicle screw fixation system…

Read the full statement (271 words)

When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally mature patients, the TSRH® Spinal System is indicated for one or more of the following: (1) degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, (2) fracture, (3) dislocation, (4) scoliosis, (5) kyphosis, (6) spinal tumor, and/or (7) failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

In addition, when used as a pedicle screw fixation system, the TSRH® Spinal System is indicated for skeletally mature patients: (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar-first sacral (L5-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 and below); and (4) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass.

When used as a posterior, non-cervical, non-pedicle screw fixation system, the TSRH® Spinal System is intended for the following indications: (1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), (2) spinal stenosis, (3) spondylolisthesis, (4) spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), (5) fracture, (6) pseudarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion.

When used as an anterolateral thoracic/lumbar system, the TSRH® Spinal System is intended for the following indications: (1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), (2) spinal stenosis, (3) spondylolisthesis, (4) spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), (5) fracture, (6) pseudarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021106: Modification to TSRH Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021106

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026