510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

TSRH Spinal System

K021170510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 9, 200288-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal

Cleared on Jul 9, 2002 after an 88-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 127 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 9, 2002
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWP
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

127 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 3 descendants cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2021: 4 descendants cleared2015: 5 descendants cleared2016: 4 descendants cleared2022: 10 descendants cleared2017: 5 descendants cleared2023: 21 descendants cleared2019: 5 descendants cleared2020: 10 descendants cleared2025: 14 descendants cleared2018: 8 descendants cleared2026: 10 descendants cleared2024: 17 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK021170 TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 86 of its ownK100737 Modification to: Trio+Spinal Fixation SystemStryker Spine · 2010
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 85 of its ownK103292 Trio Trauma Spinal SystemStryker Corporation · 2011
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 84 of its ownK133188 Mantis & Mantis Redux Spinal System, Radius Spinal System, Trio &…Stryker Spine · 2013
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 83 of its ownK142381 Xia 3 Spinal SystemStryker Corp. · 2014
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 40 of its ownK131250 Tiger Spine SystemCorelink, LLC · 2013

Showing 5 of 127 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2007: 12009: 32010: 32011: 12012: 12013: 32014: 22015: 52016: 42017: 52018: 82019: 52020: 102021: 42022: 102023: 212024: 172025: 142026: 10
2007high 21 (2023) · low 0 (2008)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 127 · See all
  • K100737Modification to: Trio+Spinal Fixation SystemStryker Spine · 2010 · cites it directly86descendants
  • K103292Trio Trauma Spinal SystemStryker Corporation · 2011 · 2 generations on85descendants
  • K133188Mantis & Mantis Redux Spinal System, Radius Spinal System, Trio & Trio+ Spinal Fixation…Stryker Spine · 2013 · 2 generations on84descendants
  • K142381Xia 3 Spinal SystemStryker Corp. · 2014 · 3 generations on83descendants
  • K131250Tiger Spine SystemCorelink, LLC · 2013 · cites it directly40descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K021170TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.2002—
+1K100737Modification to: Trio+Spinal Fixation SystemStryker Spine2010—
+2K103292Trio Trauma Spinal SystemStryker Corporation2011—
+2K133188Mantis & Mantis Redux Spinal System, Radius Spinal System, Trio & Trio+ Spinal…Stryker Spine2013—
+3K142381Xia 3 Spinal SystemStryker Corp.2014—
+1K131250Tiger Spine SystemCorelink, LLC2013—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
200930
201030
201110
201210
201330
201420
201550
201640
201750
201880
201950
2020100
202140
2022100
2023210
2024170
2025140
2026100
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021170, 2002–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—CDB Spinal System 4.0mm screws
Named without a submission number
—
*—TSRH Spinal System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (127)

See all 127

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K100737Modification to: Trio+Spinal Fixation SystemStryker Spine201086
K131250Tiger Spine SystemCorelink, LLC201340
K072429Modification to TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek200710
K090740Modification to: TSRH Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek20091
K101772TSRH (R) Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek20100

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K100737 (Stryker Spine, 2010) has gone furthest, with 86 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KWP devices

KWP Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KWP

9in 2015

2007: 142008: 132009: 122010: 142011: 122012: 182013: 122014: 132015: 9
2007high 18 (2012) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWP

113in 2015

2007: 96 days median2008: 50 days median2009: 89 days median2010: 186 days median2011: 67 days median2012: 112 days median2013: 99 days median2014: 138 days median2015: 113 days median
2007high 186 (2010) · low 50 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWP

2in 2022

2007: 22008: 12009: 232010: 22011: 62012: 12013: 32015: 12016: 32018: 12019: 22022: 2
2007high 23 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWP

494in 2025

2007: 2102008: 5942009: 6822010: 4742011: 7922012: 9182013: 1,0902014: 1,0222015: 1,3482016: 1,3792017: 8642018: 6572019: 5182020: 7962021: 5252022: 3352023: 3322024: 4362025: 494
2007high 1,379 (2016) · low 210 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714962210
200813501594
2009128923682
2010141862474
201112676792
2012181121918
2013129931,090
20141313801,022
2015911311,348
20160—31,379
20170—0864
20180—1657
20190—2518
20200—0796
20210—0525
20220—2335
20230—0332
20240—0436
20250—0494
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally mature patients, the TSRH@ Spina1 System is intended for immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc…

Read the full statement (346 words)

When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the non-cervical posterior spine in skeletally mature patients, the TSRH@ Spina1 System is intended for immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies) (2) degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, (3) fracture, (4) dislocation, (5) 'scoliosis, ( 6 ) kyphosis, (7) spinal tumor, and (8) failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).

In addition, when used as a pedicle screw fixation system, the TSRH@ Spinal System is indicated for skeletally mature patients: (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar-first sacral (L5-S1) vertebraljoint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 and below); and (4) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass.

When used as a posterior, non-cervical, non-pedicle screw fixation system, the TSRH@Spinal System is intended for the following indications: (1) degenerative disc disease (as defmed by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), (2) spinal stenosis, (3) spondylolisthesis, (4) spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), (5) fracture, (6) pseudarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion.

When used as an anterolateraVanterior system, the TSRH@ Spinal System is intended for the following indications: (1) degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), (2) spinal stenosis, (3) spondylolisthesis, (4) spinal deformities (Le., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), (5) fracture, (6) pseudarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion. The points of attachment are screw fixation into the anterolateral vertebral bodies of the lumbar and thoracic spine (Tl-LS) and into anterior vertebral bodies of the cervical spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021170: TSRH Spinal System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021170

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026