510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SCS Claris Spinal System, Lengthened Lateral Connector, Model AL06

K021379510(k) SpecialCleared May 31, 200230-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3070

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ortho Tec, LLC · MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation

Cleared on May 31, 2002 after a 30-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.

Decided
May 31, 2002
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MNI
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021379Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MNI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—SCS Extremity Connector (AL02)
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MNI devices

MNI Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MNI

1in 2017

2007: 202008: 232009: 182010: 162011: 172012: 192013: 142014: 62015: 122016: 72017: 1
2007high 23 (2008) · low 0 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MNI

168in 2016

2007: 82 days median2008: 64 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 111 days median2012: 75 days median2013: 77 days median2014: 104 days median2015: 54 days median2016: 168 days median
2007high 168 (2016) · low 54 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MNI

1in 2018

2007: 262008: 82009: 32010: 12012: 12013: 42015: 12018: 1
2007high 26 (2007) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MNI

80in 2025

2007: 832008: 1082009: 1382010: 1262011: 1462012: 2002013: 8242014: 3012015: 2602016: 1172017: 2472018: 1342019: 1882020: 1152021: 2702022: 2142023: 1222024: 1142025: 80
2007high 824 (2013) · low 80 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MNI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200720822683
200823648108
200918863138
201016741126
2011171110146
201219751200
201314774824
201461040301
201512541260
201671680117
20171—0247
20180—1134
20190—0188
20200—0115
20210—0270
20220—0214
20230—0122
20240—0114
20250—080
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

When used as a nonpedicle posterior system, the SCS system is indicated for patients with: degenerative disk disease defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies spondylolisthesis fracture spinal stenosis deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis) tumors failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis) When used as an anterolateral/anterior system the SCS system is indicated for…

Read the full statement (228 words)

When used as a nonpedicle posterior system, the SCS system is indicated for patients with:

degenerative disk disease defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies

spondylolisthesis

fracture

spinal stenosis

deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis)

tumors

failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis)

When used as an anterolateral/anterior system the SCS system is indicated for patients with:

degenerative disk disease defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies

spondylolisthesis

fracture

spinal stenosis

deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis)

tumors

failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis)

When used as a posterior pedicle system, the SCS system is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients who are:

having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5-81 joint

receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only

having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine

having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass.

screw fixation is limited to L3 and below.

Posterior pedicle systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine:

degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment

fracture

dislocation

scoliosis

kyphosis

spinal tumor

failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis)

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021379: SCS Claris Spinal System, Lengthened Lateral Connector, Model AL06.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021379

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026