510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2011

King LT, Models # KLT 100, KLT 101, KLT 102, KLT 103, KLT 104, KLT 105

K021634510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 9, 2003237-day reviewClass I21 CFR 868.5110Recalls 30

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

King Systems Corp. · CAE Airway, Oropharyngeal, Anesthesiology

Cleared on Jan 9, 2003 after a 237-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 2 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 30 times.

Decided
Jan 9, 2003
Review
237 days
Class
Class I
Product code
CAE
Recalls
30
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2004: 2 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK021634 King LT, Models # KLT 100, KLT 101, KLT 102, KLT 103, KLT 104, KLT 105King Systems Corp. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK033189 King LTS Reusable Oropharyngeal Airway with Drain/Suction Channel…King Systems Corp. · 2004
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK033186 King LT-D Disposable Oropharyngeal Airway, Models KLT 203, KLT 204…King Systems Corp. · 2004 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K033189King LTS Reusable Oropharyngeal Airway with Drain/Suction Channel, Models KLT 303, KLT…King Systems Corp. · 2004 · cites it directly0descendants
  • K033186King LT-D Disposable Oropharyngeal Airway, Models KLT 203, KLT 204 and KLT 205King Systems Corp. · 2004 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K021634King LT, Models # KLT 100, KLT 101, KLT 102, KLT 103, KLT 104, KLT 105King Systems Corp.2003—
+1K033189King LTS Reusable Oropharyngeal Airway with Drain/Suction Channel, Models KLT…King Systems Corp.2004—
+1K033186King LT-D Disposable Oropharyngeal Airway, Models KLT 203, KLT 204 and KLT 205King Systems Corp.200430

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021634, 2003–2004Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in CAE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (2)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K033189King LTS Reusable Oropharyngeal Airway with Drain/Suction Channel, Models KLT 303, KLT…King Systems Corp.20040
K033186King LT-D Disposable Oropharyngeal Airway, Models KLT 203, KLT 204 and KLT 205King Systems Corp.20040

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1708-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1715-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1712-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1705-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1709-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1717-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1713-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1719-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1706-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1714-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1720-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1721-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1707-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1710-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1716-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1718-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Jan 14, 2011Not classifiedZ-1711-2011Process controlKing Systems has been notified by Triad Group, our supplier of sterile lubricating jelly, that a recall has been initiated for this product because the product may be "inadequately sterilized" and use of this product may result in…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0975-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0976-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0977-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0978-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0979-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0974-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0981-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0982-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0986-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0980-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0983-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0984-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…
Dec 15, 2009Not classifiedZ-0985-2011Labeling False and MisleadingKing Systems was issued a warning letter from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Compliance on October 28, 2009. The warning letter asserts that Kings Systems KLT(S)-D airway exceeds cleared indications in that it…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K033189 (King Systems Corp., 2004) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All CAE devices

CAE Airway, Oropharyngeal, Anesthesiology: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · CAE

1in 2014

2014: 1
2007high 1 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · CAE

Too few CAE 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · CAE

8in 2024

2008: 12009: 132011: 202012: 102018: 12022: 42023: 22024: 82026 (partial year): 3
2007high 20 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CAE

59in 2025

2007: 42008: 52009: 52010: 12011: 192012: 82013: 422014: 312015: 142016: 692017: 752018: 562019: 802020: 302021: 622022: 512023: 522024: 592025: 59
2007high 80 (2019) · low 1 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CAE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—04
20080—15
20090—135
20100—01
20110—2019
20120—108
20130—042
20141—031
20150—014
20160—069
20170—075
20180—156
20190—080
20200—030
20210—062
20220—451
20230—252
20240—859
20250—059
20260—3—

What is it indicated for?

The KING LT oropharyngeal airway is intended for use in adult patients for controlled ventilation during anesthesia for procedures of short duration, when the patient is considered to have a low risk of aspiration of stomach contents.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021634: King LT, Models # KLT 100, KLT 101, KLT 102, KLT 103, KLT 104, KLT 105.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021634

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026