510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Weck Hem-O-Lok Automatic Ligating Clip Applier

K021808510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 14, 200272-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4300Recalls 7

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Weck · FZP Clip, Implantable

Cleared on Aug 14, 2002 after a 72-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 11 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 7 times.

Decided
Aug 14, 2002
Review
72 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FZP
Recalls
7
Predicates
0

11 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK021808 Weck Hem-O-Lok Automatic Ligating Clip ApplierWeck · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK142777 Weck Hem-o-lok Auto Endo5 Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2014 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK152081 Weck Auto Endo5 Hem-o-lok Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2015 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK062914 Hem-O-Lok Ligation ClipTeleflex Medical · 2006
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 3 of its ownK133202 Hem-O-Lok Ligating ClipTeleflex Medical · 2013
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK230480 Weck Auto Endo5 5mm Automatic Endoscopic 35cm Applier (AE05ML)Teleflex Medical · 2023

Showing 5 of 11 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2006: 12013: 12014: 12015: 12016: 12018: 12023: 12024: 12025: 22026: 1
2006high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 11 · See all
  • K142777Weck Hem-o-lok Auto Endo5 Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2014 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K152081Weck Auto Endo5 Hem-o-lok Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on4descendants
  • K062914Hem-O-Lok Ligation ClipTeleflex Medical · 2006 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K133202Hem-O-Lok Ligating ClipTeleflex Medical · 2013 · 2 generations on3descendants
  • K230480Weck Auto Endo5 5mm Automatic Endoscopic 35cm Applier (AE05ML)Teleflex Medical · 2023 · 3 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K021808Weck Hem-O-Lok Automatic Ligating Clip ApplierWeck2002—
+1K142777Weck Hem-o-lok Auto Endo5 Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc.20141
+2K152081Weck Auto Endo5 Hem-o-lok Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc.20151
+1K062914Hem-O-Lok Ligation ClipTeleflex Medical2006—
+2K133202Hem-O-Lok Ligating ClipTeleflex Medical2013—
+3K230480Weck Auto Endo5 5mm Automatic Endoscopic 35cm Applier (AE05ML)Teleflex Medical2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
201310
201410
201510
201610
201810
202310
202410
202520
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021808, 2002–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FZP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FZP device

  1. #1 K260677 Vessel Closure Device (VCD177213P)score 12.6 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Weck Hem-o-lok clips
Named without a submission number
—
*—U.S.S.C. Autosuture Endoclip 5mm Disposable Clip Applier
Named without a submission number
—
*—Weck reusable ligating clip appliers
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (11)

See all 11

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K142777Weck Hem-o-lok Auto Endo5 Ligating Clip ApplierTeleflexmedical, Inc.20145
K062914Hem-O-Lok Ligation ClipTeleflex Medical20064

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 4, 2019Class IIZ-0497-2020Under Investigation by firmCertain clip appliers have an increase in misloading and/or jamming related complaints that may be due to a discrepancy in the specification a component. Misloading and/or jamming may lead to clips falling out of the applier, clip…
Aug 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-0158-2009Packaging process controlA hole in the sterile unit blister pack was detected that would compromise sterility.
Aug 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-0160-2009Packaging process controlA hole in the sterile unit blister pack was detected that would compromise sterility.
Aug 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-0157-2009Packaging process controlA hole in the sterile unit blister pack was detected that would compromise sterility.
Aug 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-0156-2009Packaging process controlA hole in the sterile unit blister pack was detected that would compromise sterility.
Aug 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-0159-2009Packaging process controlA hole in the sterile unit blister pack was detected that would compromise sterility.
Apr 12, 2006Not classifiedZ-1099-06OtherThe Hem-o-lok ligating clips may become dislodged following ligation of the renal artery after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Hem-o-lok ligating clips are now contraindicated for use in ligating the renal artery during laparascopic…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K142777 (Teleflexmedical, Inc., 2014) has gone furthest, with 5 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All FZP devices

FZP Clip, Implantable: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FZP

5in 2025

2007: 62008: 42009: 32010: 62011: 32012: 22013: 32014: 32015: 82016: 52017: 42018: 42019: 12020: 22022: 32023: 32024: 22025: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 8 (2015) · low 0 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FZP

90in 2025

2007: 31 days median2008: 23 days median2009: 22 days median2010: 47 days median2011: 124 days median2013: 47 days median2014: 29 days median2015: 182 days median2016: 72 days median2017: 29 days median2018: 143 days median2022: 227 days median2023: 65 days median2025: 90 days median
2007high 227 (2022) · low 22 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FZP

1in 2020

2007: 12008: 62010: 12012: 12014: 12016: 22017: 12019: 32020: 1
2007high 6 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FZP

1,902in 2025

2007: 1,8772008: 9812009: 2,1602010: 2,3672011: 1,6782012: 1,6772013: 2,3812014: 2,3202015: 2,8712016: 1,8402017: 2,5942018: 2,7182019: 2,9032020: 1,7602021: 1,7592022: 1,5752023: 1,9182024: 2,0672025: 1,902
2007high 2,903 (2019) · low 981 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FZP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200763111,877
20084236981
200932202,160
201064712,367
2011312401,678
20122—11,677
201334702,381
201432912,320
2015818202,871
201657221,840
201742912,594
2018414302,718
20191—32,903
20202—11,760
20210—01,759
2022322701,575
202336501,918
20242—02,067
202559001,902
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

Weck Hem-o-lok Automatic Ligating Clip Appliers are indicated for use as delivery devices for Hem-o-lok non-absorbable polymer ligating clips. Hem-o-lok ligating clips are intended for use in procedures involving ligation of vessels or tissue structures. Surgeons should apply the appropriate size clip for the size of the vessel or tissue structures to be ligated such that the clip completely encompasses the vessel or tissue structure.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021808: Weck Hem-O-Lok Automatic Ligating Clip Applier.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021808

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026