510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Aart Silicone Carving Block

K021820510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 16, 200242-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.3620Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Aesthetic and Reconstructive Technologies, Inc. · MIB Elastomer, Silicone Block

Cleared on Jul 16, 2002 after a 42-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 5 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jul 16, 2002
Review
42 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MIB
Recalls
1
Predicates
0

5 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2018: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK021820 Aart Silicone Carving BlockAesthetic and Reconstructive Technologies, Inc. · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK171851 SoftxilBistool · 2018
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK193392 BioSiCar Silicone ImplantMetalware Technology Corp. · 2020
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK241150 MISTI Silicone ImplantKeosan Trading Co. · 2024
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK222748 ShiNeo Silicone ImplantShineo Technology Co., Ltd. · 2022
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK071823 Perma Facial ImplantsSurgisil · 2007

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K171851SoftxilBistool · 2018 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K193392BioSiCar Silicone ImplantMetalware Technology Corp. · 2020 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K241150MISTI Silicone ImplantKeosan Trading Co. · 2024 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K222748ShiNeo Silicone ImplantShineo Technology Co., Ltd. · 2022 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K071823Perma Facial ImplantsSurgisil · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K021820Aart Silicone Carving BlockAesthetic and Reconstructive Technologies, Inc.2002—
+1K171851SoftxilBistool2018—
+2K193392BioSiCar Silicone ImplantMetalware Technology Corp.2020—
+2K241150MISTI Silicone ImplantKeosan Trading Co.2024—
+3K222748ShiNeo Silicone ImplantShineo Technology Co., Ltd.2022—
+1K071823Perma Facial ImplantsSurgisil2007—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200710
201810
202010
202210
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021820, 2002–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MIB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MIB device

  1. #1 K241150 MISTI Silicone Implantscore 8.0 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Silicone Carving Block marketed by Hanson Medical, Inc.
Named without a submission number
—
*—Spectrum Designs Pre-Form Contour Silicone Carving Block
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (5)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K171851SoftxilBistool20183
K071823Perma Facial ImplantsSurgisil20070

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Sep 26, 2025Class IIZ-0944-2026No Marketing ApplicationDue to manufactured products that deviated from established specifications and being distributed without obtaining the required FDA premarket approvals or clearances.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K171851 (Bistool, 2018) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MIB devices

MIB Elastomer, Silicone Block: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MIB

1in 2024

2017: 12018: 12019: 12020: 12022: 32023: 12024: 1
2007high 3 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MIB

102in 2022

2022: 102 days median
2007high 102 (2022)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MIB

3in 2025

2025: 3
2007high 3 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MIB

18in 2025

2010: 22011: 12012: 22014: 12015: 22016: 12017: 12018: 102019: 32020: 12021: 52022: 192023: 742024: 322025: 18
2007high 74 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MIB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—02
20110—01
20120—02
20130—00
20140—01
20150—02
20160—01
20171—01
20181—010
20191—03
20201—01
20210—05
20223102019
20231—074
20241—032
20250—318
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The intended use of the AART Silicone Carving Block is for augmentation and reconstructive surgery where additional shaping by the surgeon may be necessary. The rectangular blocks are designed for carving flatter devices for use in bone onlay for correction of surface defects resulting from skeletal anomalies such as depressions secondary to trauma or surgery. The contoured blocks are generally used for carving curved devices such as nasals or malars or used in body contouring to minimize muscular defects.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021820: Aart Silicone Carving Block.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021820

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026