510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cell Robotics Ultra-Light Peel Laser System

K021946510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 11, 200290-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cell Robotics, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Sep 11, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K954013 (Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc., 1996) and 2 other predicates after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1996.

Decided
Sep 11, 2002
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K954013 (1996). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK954013 Trilase 2940 Erbium LaserSchwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. · 1996
  2. 3 generations backK961748 Medlite/Erbium Laser SystemContinuum Biomedical, Inc. · 1996
  3. 2 generations backK980361 Dermablate ER: Yag Laser SystemAesculap-Meditec North America · 1998
  4. 1 generation backK014057 Dermastar ER:Yag Laser SystemAsclepion-Meditec AG · 2002
  5. This deviceK021946 Cell Robotics Ultra-Light Peel Laser SystemCell Robotics, Inc. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K954013Trilase 2940 Erbium LaserSchwartz Electro-Optics, Inc.1996—
−3K961748Medlite/Erbium Laser SystemContinuum Biomedical, Inc.1996—
−2K980361Dermablate ER: Yag Laser SystemAesculap-Meditec North America1998—
−1K014057Dermastar ER:Yag Laser SystemAsclepion-Meditec AG2002—
0 (this device)K021946Cell Robotics Ultra-Light Peel Laser SystemCell Robotics, Inc.2002—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199720
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021946, 1996–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K954013Trilase 2940 Erbium Laser
Summary page 1
…d, Laser 79-GEX 21 CFR878-48 Legally Marketed Predicale Schwartz Electro-Optics TriLase2940, I(# 954013 Device: Cell Robotics Er:YAG Laser System, K# 970461 Asceplion-Meditec…
Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc.1996—
*K970461Cell Robotics ER: Yag Surgical Laser
Summary page 1
…21 CFR878-48 Legally Marketed Predicale Schwartz Electro-Optics TriLase2940, I(# 954013 Device: Cell Robotics Er:YAG Laser System, K# 970461 Asceplion-Meditec Dermastar Er:YAG Laser System, R#014057 Descr…
Cell Robotics, Inc.1997—
*K014057Dermastar ER:Yag Laser System
Summary page 1
…Cell Robotics Er:YAG Laser System, K# 970461 Asceplion-Meditec Dermastar Er:YAG Laser System, R#014057 Description of the Device The Cell Robotics Ultra-Light Laser System is an Er:YAG laser p…
Asclepion-Meditec AG2002—

Also cleared against K954013: 13 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • 13 other devices also cite its predicate K954013.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Cell Robotics, Inc. Ultra-Light laser system is intended for coagulation, vaporization, ablation, or cutting of soft tissue (skin) in dermatology, plastic surgery (including aesthetic surgery), oral surgery, and ophthamology.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021946: Cell Robotics Ultra-Light Peel Laser System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021946

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026