510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

Stryker Navigation System - Hip Module

K022365510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 22, 2003184-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.4560Recalls 10

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Stryker Instruments · HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument

Cleared on Jan 22, 2003 after a 184-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 125 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 10 times.

Decided
Jan 22, 2003
Review
184 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HAW
Recalls
10
Predicates
0

125 later devices descend from it, 7 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2017: 15 descendants cleared2007: 2 descendants cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2010: 3 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2006: 1 descendant cleared2021: 10 descendants cleared2009: 3 descendants cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2012: 3 descendants cleared2013: 3 descendants cleared2023: 13 descendants cleared2022: 5 descendants cleared2014: 5 descendants cleared2020: 13 descendants cleared2019: 7 descendants cleared2024: 11 descendants cleared2026: 12 descendants cleared2018: 4 descendants cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2025: 7 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK022365 Stryker Navigation System - Hip ModuleStryker Instruments · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 81 of its ownK070731 Pigalileo Total Hip Replacement (THR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG · 2007
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 79 of its ownK080875 Pigalileo 4TH Generation SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 78 of its ownK090420 Smith & Nephew Pigalileo Screw Targeting System V 1.0Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 77 of its ownK092497 Smith & Nephew Pigalileo Screw Targeting System, Version 1.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009
  6. Descendant · 5 generations on · 75 of its ownK100107 Smith & Nephew Sureshot Distal Targeting System V2.0Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2010 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 125 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2005: 12006: 12007: 22008: 22009: 32010: 32011: 22012: 32013: 32014: 52015: 12016: 22017: 152018: 42019: 72020: 132021: 102022: 52023: 132024: 112025: 72026: 12
2005high 15 (2017) · low 1 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 125 · See all
  • K070731Pigalileo Total Hip Replacement (THR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG · 2007 · cites it directly81descendants
  • K080875Pigalileo 4TH Generation SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations on79descendants
  • K090420Smith & Nephew Pigalileo Screw Targeting System V 1.0Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on78descendants
  • K092497Smith & Nephew Pigalileo Screw Targeting System, Version 1.1Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2009 · 4 generations on77descendants
  • K100107Smith & Nephew Sureshot Distal Targeting System V2.0Smith & Nephew, Inc. · 2010 · 5 generations on75descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K022365Stryker Navigation System - Hip ModuleStryker Instruments2003—
+1K070731Pigalileo Total Hip Replacement (THR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG2007—
+2K080875Pigalileo 4TH Generation SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.2008—
+3K090420Smith & Nephew Pigalileo Screw Targeting System V 1.0Smith & Nephew, Inc.2009—
+4K092497Smith & Nephew Pigalileo Screw Targeting System, Version 1.1Smith & Nephew, Inc.2009—
+5K100107Smith & Nephew Sureshot Distal Targeting System V2.0Smith & Nephew, Inc.20101

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
200610
200720
200820
200930
201030
201120
201230
201330
201450
201510
201620
2017150
201840
201970
2020130
2021100
202250
2023130
2024110
202570
2026120
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K022365, 2003–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HAW device

  1. #1 K253856 Geniant Cranial (Navigated Neurosurgical…score 15.0 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it? (125)

See all 125

7 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K070731Pigalileo Total Hip Replacement (THR) SystemPlus Orthopedics AG200781
K050615Stryker Navigation System - CT-Based Hip Module, Model 6007-621-000Stryker Instruments200529
K093425Mako Surgical Corp Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System-ThaMako Surgical Corp.201011
K162937Stryker OrthoMap Versatile Hip SystemStryker Corporation20179
K080450Stryker Power Tool Navigator AttachmentStryker Corp.20081
K072271Stryker Navigation System Infinitus Hip Resurfacing ModuleStryker Corp.20070
K053348Stryker Orthopaedics Rfid InstrumentationHowmedica Osteonics Corp.20060

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 4, 2015Class IIZ-1810-2015Process controlStryker initiated a device recall of the Navigation System II-Cart, Camera Articulated Arm because there is a potential that the weld seam between the main stud and the two flaps on the Articulated Arm was not welded in the correct…
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2288-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2294-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2291-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2289-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2292-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2293-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jun 5, 2008Not classifiedZ-2290-2008Labeling False and MisleadingInstructions have been updated to include new warnings regarding percutaneous pin placement during surgery in order to mitigate the risk of femur fractures.
Jul 14, 2004Not classifiedZ-0021-05OtherThe tracker is not locking adequately to the anchoring pin, resulting in unacceptable movement, which will affected the patient tracker system.
Jul 14, 2004Not classifiedZ-0020-05OtherThe tracker is not locking adequately to the anchoring pin, resulting in unacceptable movement, which will affected the patient tracker system.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K070731 (Plus Orthopedics AG, 2007) has gone furthest, with 81 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HAW devices

HAW Neurological Stereotaxic Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HAW

9in 2025

2007: 152008: 122009: 82010: 62011: 42012: 82013: 32014: 52015: 102016: 92017: 72018: 62019: 102020: 52021: 92022: 72023: 142024: 72025: 92026 (partial year): 5
2007high 15 (2007) · low 3 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HAW

163in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 112 days median2009: 221 days median2010: 138 days median2011: 66 days median2012: 178 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 238 days median2015: 232 days median2016: 175 days median2017: 226 days median2018: 112 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 168 days median2022: 128 days median2023: 142 days median2024: 107 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 162 days median
2007high 238 (2014) · low 66 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HAW

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 102009: 62010: 282011: 52012: 42013: 6, 1 Class I2014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 22018: 2, 2 Class I2019: 4, 1 Class I2020: 12021: 4, 2 Class I2022: 12023: 4, 1 Class I2024: 2, 2 Class I2025: 22026 (partial year): 6
2007high 28 (2010) · low 1 (2020)2026

Class I (9 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HAW

3,425in 2025

2007: 492008: 532009: 962010: 2992011: 1,7252012: 9862013: 1,2902014: 1,6062015: 1,7672016: 1,8282017: 3,5052018: 4,4392019: 6,0622020: 3,4802021: 2,8272022: 1,9292023: 2,5102024: 3,7552025: 3,425
2007high 6,062 (2019) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200715107249
2008121121053
20098221696
2010613828299
201146651,725
201281784986
201331726 (1)1,290
2014523851,606
20151023231,767
2016917551,828
2017722623,505
201861122 (2)4,439
2019101474 (1)6,062
202058813,480
202191684 (2)2,827
2022712811,929
2023141424 (1)2,510
202471072 (2)3,755
2025916323,425
202651626—

What is it indicated for?

The system must be used within the operating theatre and should be operated only by trained personnel such as orthopedic surgeons and clinic staff.

The Stryker Navigation System - Hip Module supports, but is not limited to the following surgical procedures

Any form of Total Hip Athroplasty (THA), e.g. open of minimal-invasive

Precisely position instruments, implants and bony tissue during orthopedic surgery, such as operations performed with Hip and bones in the upper extremities

Revisions

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K022365: Stryker Navigation System - Hip Module.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K022365

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026