510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · 2009

Accolade TMZF Plus HA 127 Size 0 Hip Stem

K023102510(k) SpecialCleared Oct 9, 200221-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353Recalls 13

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · MEH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-Porous, Calcium Phosphate

Cleared on Oct 9, 2002 after a 21-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 306 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 13 times.

Decided
Oct 9, 2002
Review
21 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MEH
Recalls
13
Predicates
0

306 later devices descend from it, 5 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 22 descendants cleared2016: 12 descendants cleared2004: 2 descendants cleared2011: 15 descendants cleared2006: 5 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2008: 6 descendants cleared2010: 6 descendants cleared2021: 20 descendants cleared2017: 19 descendants cleared2018: 19 descendants cleared2019: 19 descendants cleared2013: 22 descendants cleared2014: 9 descendants cleared2015: 9 descendants cleared2022: 20 descendants cleared2020: 19 descendants cleared2023: 19 descendants cleared2009: 5 descendants cleared2024: 14 descendants cleared2025: 23 descendants cleared2026: 19 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK023102 Accolade TMZF Plus HA 127 Size 0 Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2002
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 267 of its ownK040191 Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 198 of its ownK042344 Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 166 of its ownK043079 Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap · 2004
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 117 of its ownK093472 Trinity Acetabular SystemCorin USA · 2010 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 109 of its ownK110087 Corin Trinity Acetbular System with Hxlpe LinersCorin USA · 2011

Showing 5 of 306 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 22005: 12006: 52007: 12008: 62009: 52010: 62011: 152012: 222013: 222014: 92015: 92016: 122017: 192018: 192019: 192020: 192021: 202022: 202023: 192024: 142025: 232026: 19
2004high 23 (2025) · low 1 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 306 · See all
  • K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap · 2004 · cites it directly267descendants
  • K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2005 · 2 generations on198descendants
  • K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap · 2004 · cites it directly166descendants
  • K093472Trinity Acetabular SystemCorin USA · 2010 · 2 generations on117descendants
  • K110087Corin Trinity Acetbular System with Hxlpe LinersCorin USA · 2011 · 3 generations on109descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K023102Accolade TMZF Plus HA 127 Size 0 Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics Corp.2002—
+1K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap2004—
+2K042344Excia Total Hip SystemAesculap, Inc.200510
+1K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap2004—
+2K093472Trinity Acetabular SystemCorin USA20101
+3K110087Corin Trinity Acetbular System with Hxlpe LinersCorin USA2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200420
200510
200650
200710
200860
200950
201060
2011150
2012220
2013220
201490
201590
2016120
2017190
2018190
2019190
2020190
2021200
2022200
2023190
2024140
2025230
2026190
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K023102, 2002–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MEH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MEH device

  1. #1 K210581 Actis DuoFix Hip Prosthesis- Collarlessscore 23.9 · 16 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Accolade TMZF Plus HA Hip Stem
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (306)

See all 306

5 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K040191Bicontact Hip Stem and Femoral HeadAesculap2004267
K043079Bicontact Hip System with U-CapAesculap2004166
K103479Novel Tapered Hip StemStryker Corp.201153
K120578Accolade II Hip StemHowmedica Osteonics201246
K153345Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling UpdateStryker Orthopaedics201617

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1681-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1683-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1373-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1682-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1369-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1367-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1368-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1371-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1372-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1365-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1364-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1370-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.
Jan 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-1366-2009Process controlProduct deviation : Specific lots of sprayed HA hip stems did not meet Stryker's Internal Material Specification for tensile bond strength and crystallinity.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K040191 (Aesculap, 2004) has gone furthest, with 267 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MEH devices

MEH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-Porous, Calcium Phosphate: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MEH

5in 2025

2007: 22008: 62009: 62010: 52011: 52012: 62013: 12015: 22016: 62017: 32018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 32022: 32023: 22024: 62025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2008) · low 0 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MEH

87in 2025

2008: 79 days median2009: 65 days median2010: 226 days median2011: 95 days median2012: 131 days median2016: 163 days median2017: 209 days median2020: 131 days median2021: 83 days median2022: 150 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 87 days median
2007high 226 (2010) · low 65 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MEH

1in 2025

2007: 32008: 802009: 512010: 162011: 42012: 32014: 12015: 12016: 42017: 12018: 32020: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 80 (2008) · low 0 (2013)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MEH

470in 2025

2007: 252008: 2612009: 5392010: 4622011: 4192012: 1,6062013: 1,2952014: 1,1962015: 4902016: 3472017: 3832018: 3372019: 3352020: 3382021: 3722022: 3162023: 3342024: 3542025: 470
2007high 1,606 (2012) · low 25 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MEH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—325
200867980261
200966551539
2010522616462
20115954419
2012613131,606
20131—01,295
20140—11,196
20152—1490
201661634347
201732091383
20182—3337
20191—0335
202031311338
20213830372
202231500316
20232—0334
20246910354
20255871470
20261—1—

What is it indicated for?

The subject hip stem is a single-use device intended for use in total hip replacement. It is intended for the reconstruction of the head and neck of the femoral joint. This hip stem is intended for primary reconstruction of the proximal femur or revision total hip arthroplasty. This device is intended for use with any currently available Howmedica Osteonics acetabular component and V40m femoral heads that can be mated with a TMZF 5" 40' BG trunnion.…

Read the full statement (129 words)

The subject hip stem is a single-use device intended for use in total hip replacement. It is intended for the reconstruction of the head and neck of the femoral joint. This hip stem is intended for primary reconstruction of the proximal femur or revision total hip arthroplasty. This device is intended for use with any currently available Howmedica Osteonics acetabular component and V40m femoral heads that can be mated with a TMZF 5" 40' BG trunnion.

Cementless primary hip surgery in cases of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and correction of hnctional deformity.

Treatment of nonunion, and femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques.

Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K023102: Accolade TMZF Plus HA 127 Size 0 Hip Stem.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K023102

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026