510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCadence Peek Cemeent Restrictor
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Spinal Concepts, Inc. · JDK Prosthesis, Hip, Cement Restrictor
Cleared on Nov 27, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K022218 (Spinal Concepts, Inc., 2002) after a 28-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2001. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Nov 27, 2002
- Review
- 28 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JDK
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K003718 (2001). 4 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 2 generations backK003718 Titanium Cement Restrictor (TCR)Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · 2001
- 1 generation backK022218 Cadence Cement RestrictorSpinal Concepts, Inc. · 2002
- This deviceK023647 Cadence Peek Cemeent RestrictorSpinal Concepts, Inc. · 2002
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK031318 Traxis Cement RestrictorSpinal Concepts, Inc. · 2003
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK041583 Peek Cement Restrictor X-BoxInnovasis, Inc. · 2004
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | K003718 | Titanium Cement Restrictor (TCR) | Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −1 | K022218 | Cadence Cement Restrictor | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | 2002 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K023647 | Cadence Peek Cemeent Restrictor | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | 2002 | — |
| +1 | K031318 | Traxis Cement Restrictor | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| +2 | K041583 | Peek Cement Restrictor X-Box | Innovasis, Inc. | 2004 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 1 | 0 |
| 2004 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JDK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JDK device
- #1 K210062 Mectaplug PE IIscore 5.0 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K022218 | Cadence Cement Restrictor | 2002 |
What descends from it? (2)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K031318 | Traxis Cement Restrictor | 2003 | 1 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 1 year and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
- None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
- Of its descendants, K031318 (Spinal Concepts, Inc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
- 2 other devices also cite its predicate K022218.
How does its category compare?
All JDK devicesJDK Prosthesis, Hip, Cement Restrictor: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JDK
1in 2021
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JDK
Too few JDK 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · JDK
5in 2011
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JDK
6in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JDK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 6 | 3 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 5 | 3 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Cadence PEEK Cement Restrictor System is intended for use as a cement restrictor in orthopedic surgeries such as those involving the femoral canal and tibial plateau in hip stem and total knee replacement.
This device is not intended for any spinal indications. The safety and effectiveness of this device when implanted in the spine have not been established.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K023647 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K023647: Cadence Peek Cemeent Restrictor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K023647
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026