510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Vitique System

K023649510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Jan 17, 200379-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3275

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Dmg USA, Inc. · EMA Cement, Dental

Cleared on Jan 17, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K971372 (Ivoclar North America, Inc., 1997) and 4 other predicates after a 79-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994.

Decided
Jan 17, 2003
Review
79 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EMA
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K933139 (1994). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 2 other ancestors2000: 1 other ancestorK933139 · 3M Vitremer Luting Cement · 3M Company · 1994K022476 · Relyx Rmgip · 3M Company · 20021990199520002005
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 3 other ancestors2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K022476 · Relyx Rmgip · 3M Company · 2002K933139 · 3M Vitremer Luting Cement · 3M Company · 19940
  1. Root · 2 generations backK933139 3M Vitremer Luting Cement3M Company · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK022476 Relyx Rmgip3M Company · 2002
  3. This deviceK023649 Vitique SystemDmg USA, Inc. · 2003
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K9331393M Vitremer Luting Cement3M Company1994—
−1K022476Relyx Rmgip3M Company2002—
0 (this device)K023649Vitique SystemDmg USA, Inc.2003—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199720
199810
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K023649, 1994–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EMA device

  1. #1 K254109 G-Cem Universalscore 15.0 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (8)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K971372Variolink II
Summary page 1
…cation is Class 11. 'redica te Devices: Product Name 510(k) # Manufacturer Variolink I1 K971372 Vivadent Nexus K9728 58 Kerr Panavia F…
Ivoclar North America, Inc.1997—
*K972858Kerr Nexus One Bottle Adhesive
Summary page 1
…510(k) # Manufacturer Variolink I1 K971372 Vivadent Nexus K9728 58 Kerr Panavia F unknown Kuraray Calibra…
Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc.1997—
*K022476Relyx Rmgip3M Company2002—
*K9331393M Vitremer Luting Cement
Summary page 1
…unknown Dentsply Rely X KO22476 3M Vitremer K933 139 3M Principle unknown Dentsply ProTec Cem…
3M Company1994—
*K980922Protec Cem.
Summary page 1
…r K933 139 3M Principle unknown Dentsply ProTec Cem K980922 Vivadent Produc t Description: The Vi1 ique System consists of: Vitique Cement - a highly aesthetic luting c…
Ivoclar North America, Inc.1998—
*—Panavia F
Named without a submission number
—
*—Calibra
Named without a submission number
—
*—Principle
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K971372: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 8.6 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K971372.

How does its category compare?

All EMA devices

EMA Cement, Dental: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EMA

10in 2025

2007: 62008: 132009: 102010: 142011: 82012: 102013: 122014: 42015: 92016: 102017: 32018: 32019: 72020: 82021: 42022: 72023: 22024: 32025: 102026 (partial year): 7
2007high 14 (2010) · low 2 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EMA

106in 2025

2007: 48 days median2008: 71 days median2009: 86 days median2010: 86 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 128 days median2013: 178 days median2014: 174 days median2015: 134 days median2016: 182 days median2017: 141 days median2018: 237 days median2019: 127 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 184 days median2022: 245 days median2024: 59 days median2025: 106 days median2026 (partial year): 150 days median
2007high 245 (2022) · low 48 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EMA

1in 2023

2008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 52023: 1
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EMA

9in 2025

2007: 332008: 502009: 902010: 1062011: 2242012: 2492013: 3852014: 2072015: 852016: 162017: 132018: 42019: 122020: 52021: 82022: 32023: 62024: 52025: 9
2007high 385 (2013) · low 3 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007648033
20081371250
20091086190
201014861106
20118795224
2012101280249
2013121780385
201441740207
20159134085
201610182016
20173141013
2018323704
20197127012
2020816405
2021418408
2022724503
20232—16
202435905
20251010609
202671500—

What is it indicated for?

The Vitique System consists of a highly aesthetic luting cement in various shades, Try-In pastes that precisely match the corresponding cement shade to approximate the final result, a silanating agent to prepare ceramic surfaces for bonding, and a bonding system (etching gel, bonding system) for bonding to tooth structure. The Vitique System is intended for use in permanent luting of definitive restorations of all kinds (metal, ceramic, composite)…

Read the full statement (126 words)

The Vitique System consists of a highly aesthetic luting cement in various shades, Try-In pastes that precisely match the corresponding cement shade to approximate the final result, a silanating agent to prepare ceramic surfaces for bonding, and a bonding system (etching gel, bonding system) for bonding to tooth structure.

The Vitique System is intended for use in permanent luting of definitive restorations of all kinds (metal, ceramic, composite), including veneers, crowns and bridges, onlays, telescopic crowns, attachments, pins and posts, orthodontic appliances, luting of ornaments, splinting etc. as well as a add-on for resin based materials

The Try-in pastes may also be used as a general water soluble separating agent (e.g. isolating material for use with prefabricated crowns, retraction cords etc.) or as an oxyguard gel.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K023649: Vitique System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K023649

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026