510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Dual-Lumen Catheter

K024165510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Jan 10, 200324-day reviewClass II21 CFR 874.4680

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bistech, Inc. · EOQ Bronchoscope (Flexible Or Rigid)

Cleared on Jan 10, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K963252 (Boston Scientific Corp, 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 24-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1991.

Decided
Jan 10, 2003
Review
24 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EOQ
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K914181 (1991). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1993: 1 other ancestorK914181 · Wang/Mill-Rose Transbronchial Aspiration Needle · Mill-Rose Laboratory · 1991 · recalledK963252 · TBAN · Boston Scientific Corp · 19961990199520002005
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K963252 · TBAN · Boston Scientific Corp · 1996K914181 · Wang/Mill-Rose Transbronchial Aspiration Needle · Mill-Rose Laboratory · 1991 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK914181 Wang/Mill-Rose Transbronchial Aspiration NeedleMill-Rose Laboratory · 1991 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK963252 TBANBoston Scientific Corp · 1996
  3. This deviceK024165 Dual-Lumen CatheterBistech, Inc. · 2003
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K914181Wang/Mill-Rose Transbronchial Aspiration NeedleMill-Rose Laboratory19914
−1K963252TBANBoston Scientific Corp1996—
0 (this device)K024165Dual-Lumen CatheterBistech, Inc.2003—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K024165, 1991–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EOQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EOQ device

  1. #1 K223299 Ambu® aScope™ 5 Broncho HD 5.0/2.2, Ambu®…score 18.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K963252TBAN
Summary page 1
…Product Name I 510(k)# I Manufacturer Aspiration Needle Set Unknown Olympus Stifcor Transbronchial K963252 Boston Scientific - Aspiration Needle Microvasive Combicath Doub…
Boston Scientific Corp1996—
*K974642Combicath Catheter
Our reading of the summary gave K974632, which is not a number in FDA’s lists. Corrected to the number one digit away whose FDA name carries the summary’s words for the device, “Combicath Double Plugged Telescoping Catheter”.
Plastimed Laboratoire Pharmaceutique19986
*—Aspiration Needle Set
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K963252: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.3 years on median.
  • 2 of the 4 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K963252.

How does its category compare?

All EOQ devices

EOQ Bronchoscope (Flexible Or Rigid): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EOQ

20in 2025

2007: 22008: 22009: 32012: 22013: 42014: 32015: 62016: 32017: 42018: 72019: 112020: 102021: 152022: 112023: 122024: 132025: 202026 (partial year): 9
2007high 20 (2025) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EOQ

147in 2025

2009: 24 days median2013: 178 days median2014: 302 days median2015: 206 days median2016: 262 days median2017: 136 days median2018: 212 days median2019: 147 days median2020: 103 days median2021: 169 days median2022: 134 days median2023: 160 days median2024: 130 days median2025: 147 days median2026 (partial year): 206 days median
2007high 302 (2014) · low 24 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EOQ

25in 2025

2011: 12012: 42016: 12019: 12020: 12021: 92022: 52023: 18, 4 Class I2024: 42025: 25, 24 Class I
2007high 25 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (28 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EOQ

6,546in 2025

2007: 392008: 872009: 1142010: 1002011: 962012: 932013: 932014: 982015: 1322016: 2972017: 3372018: 2792019: 6542020: 5152021: 1,3582022: 2,5412023: 5,0642024: 6,0512025: 6,546
2007high 6,546 (2025) · low 39 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EOQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—039
20082—087
20093240114
20100—0100
20110—196
20122—493
20134178093
20143302098
201562060132
201632621297
201741360337
201872120279
2019111471654
2020101031515
20211516991,358
20221113452,541
20231216018 (4)5,064
20241313046,051
20252014725 (24)6,546
202692060—

What is it indicated for?

For use with a bronchoscope to deliver fluids to or withdraw fluids from the lung.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K024165: Dual-Lumen Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K024165

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026