510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Consensus Unipolar Head, Cocr

K030205510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 1, 200370-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3360

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Hayes Medical, Inc. · KWL Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal

Cleared on Apr 1, 2003 after a 70-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 34 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 1, 2003
Review
70 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KWL
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

34 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 5 descendants cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 2 descendants cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2017: 3 descendants cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2024: 4 descendants cleared2026: 5 descendants cleared2023: 2 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK030205 Consensus Unipolar Head, CocrHayes Medical, Inc. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 33 of its ownK102399 Consensus Taperset Hip SystemConsensus Orthopedics, Inc. · 2010
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 20 of its ownK121935 Taperset Hip Small StemsConsensus Orthopedics, Inc. · 2012
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 19 of its ownK161184 iNSitu Total Hip SystemTheken Companies, LLC · 2016
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 9 of its ownK163577 Ecofit® Hip SystemImplantcast GmbH · 2017 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 7 of its ownK172501 iNSitu Total Hip SystemTheken Companies, LLC · 2017

Showing 5 of 34 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 12011: 22012: 52013: 12015: 22016: 12017: 32018: 12019: 22020: 12021: 12022: 22023: 22024: 42025: 12026: 5
2010high 5 (2012) · low 0 (2014)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 34 · See all
  • K102399Consensus Taperset Hip SystemConsensus Orthopedics, Inc. · 2010 · cites it directly33descendants
  • K121935Taperset Hip Small StemsConsensus Orthopedics, Inc. · 2012 · 2 generations on20descendants
  • K161184iNSitu Total Hip SystemTheken Companies, LLC · 2016 · 3 generations on19descendants
  • K163577Ecofit® Hip SystemImplantcast GmbH · 2017 · 4 generations on9descendants
  • K172501iNSitu Total Hip SystemTheken Companies, LLC · 2017 · 4 generations on7descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K030205Consensus Unipolar Head, CocrHayes Medical, Inc.2003—
+1K102399Consensus Taperset Hip SystemConsensus Orthopedics, Inc.2010—
+2K121935Taperset Hip Small StemsConsensus Orthopedics, Inc.2012—
+3K161184iNSitu Total Hip SystemTheken Companies, LLC2016—
+4K163577Ecofit® Hip SystemImplantcast GmbH20171
+4K172501iNSitu Total Hip SystemTheken Companies, LLC2017—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201120
201250
201310
201520
201610
201730
201810
201920
202010
202110
202220
202320
202440
202510
202650
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K030205, 2003–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KWL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KWL device

  1. #1 K253675 OsteoRemedies Hip Spacer Systemscore 16.0 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (34)

See all 34

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102399Consensus Taperset Hip SystemConsensus Orthopedics, Inc.201033
K122512CS2 Hip SystemConsensus Orthopedics, Inc.20123

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K102399 (Consensus Orthopedics, Inc., 2010) has gone furthest, with 33 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KWL devices

KWL Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KWL

3in 2025

2007: 22008: 12011: 22012: 12015: 12018: 22019: 12020: 12022: 12024: 12025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 3 (2025) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KWL

32in 2025

2025: 32 days median
2007high 32 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KWL

2in 2017

2007: 362009: 22015: 12017: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 36 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KWL

29in 2025

2007: 112008: 132009: 212010: 552011: 512012: 622013: 892014: 1072015: 2232016: 2102017: 3472018: 2942019: 4152020: 2702021: 1072022: 992023: 482024: 1432025: 29
2007high 415 (2019) · low 11 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KWL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—3611
20081—013
20090—221
20100—055
20112—051
20121—062
20130—089
20140—0107
20151—1223
20160—0210
20170—2347
20182—0294
20191—0415
20201—0270
20210—0107
20221—099
20230—048
20241—0143
2025332029
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

The cobalt-chrome unipolar femoral head is design for use with the Consensus@ or UniSyn @ Hip Systems, and is not intended for substitution with components of other systems. The indications for use are: With Consensus@ System: A) Primary intervention of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, post traumatic arthritis or degenerative arthritis, and avascular necrosis with a non-acute fracture of the femoral neck. B) Osteoarthrosis involving femoral and…

Read the full statement (289 words)

The cobalt-chrome unipolar femoral head is design for use with the Consensus@ or UniSyn @ Hip Systems, and is not intended for substitution with components of other systems. The indications for use are:

With Consensus@ System:

A) Primary intervention of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, post traumatic arthritis or degenerative arthritis, and avascular necrosis with a non-acute fracture of the femoral neck.

B) Osteoarthrosis involving femoral and acetabular articular surfaces.

C) Avascular osteonecrosis and/or non-union of acute femoral neck fractures.

D) Fracture or dislocation of the hip.

E) Replacement of unsatisfactory cemented or press fit hip components if sufficient bone stock exists.

With UniSyn System:

Significantly impaired joints resulting from rheumatoid, osteo, and post-traumatic arthritis.

Revision of failed femoral head replacement, hip arthroplasty or other hip procedures.

Proximal femoral fractures.

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Non-union of proximal femoral neck fractures.

Other indications such as congenital dysplasia, arthrodesis conversion, coxa magna, coxa plana, coxa vara, coxa valga, developmental conditions, metabolic and tumorous conditions, osteomalacia, pseudarthrosis conversion, and structural abnormalities.

Indications for the use of the UniSyn Hip System must be carefully considered with respect to the patient's entire evaluation and alternative procedures. Patient selection is dependent on age, general health, available bone stock and quality, and any prior surgery or anticipated future surgery. Prosthetic replacement is generally indicated only for patients who have reached skeletal maturity. Total joint replacement in younger patients should be considered only when explicit indications outweigh the associated risks of the surgery and modified demands regarding activity and joint loading are assured. This includes all patients who may or may not have multiple joint involvement, for whom restoration of joint mobility leads to an expectation of greater mobility and an improvement in the quality of life.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K030205: Consensus Unipolar Head, Cocr.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K030205

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026