510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Fyrelink

K030242510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 10, 200346-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mpacs, LLC · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Mar 10, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K980060 (Mpacs, LLC, 1998) and 2 other predicates after a 46-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1995.

Decided
Mar 10, 2003
Review
46 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K950279 (1995). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK950279 TOMTECP90Tomtec Imaging Systems, Inc. · 1995
  2. 2 generations backK964803 Univision Echocardiology SystemNetwork Concepts, Inc. · 1997
  3. 1 generation backK980060 EcholinkMpacs, LLC · 1998
  4. This deviceK030242 FyrelinkMpacs, LLC · 2003
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K950279TOMTECP90Tomtec Imaging Systems, Inc.1995—
−2K964803Univision Echocardiology SystemNetwork Concepts, Inc.1997—
−1K980060EcholinkMpacs, LLC1998—
0 (this device)K030242FyrelinkMpacs, LLC2003—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K030242, 1995–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K980060Echolink
Summary page 2
…-8- MPACS. LLC E. Equivalent Devices The equivalent legally marketed devices are the echoLINK system (5 10(k) Number K980060) manufactured by MPACS and the EnConcert system ( 5 1O(k) Number K954668) manufactured by Philips Medical Systems for routine ech…
Mpacs, LLC1998—
*K954668HP Echo Image Management System
Summary page 2
…ivalent Devices The equivalent legally marketed devices are the echoLINK system (5 10(k) Number K980060) manufactured by MPACS and the EnConcert system ( 5 1O(k) Number K954668) manufactured by Philips Medical Systems for routine echocardiography and the TomTecPg0( 5 1O(k) Number K950279) manufactured by…
Hewlett-Packard Co.1995—
*K950279TOMTECP90
Summary page 2
…ctured by MPACS and the EnConcert system ( 5 1O(k) Number K954668) manufactured by Philips Medical Systems for routine echocardiography and the TomTecPg0( 5 1O(k) Number K950279) manufactured by TomTec Imaging Systems, Inc. for stress echocardiography. F. Device Description fyreLINK (formerly echoLINK) n…
Tomtec Imaging Systems, Inc.1995—
†K964803Univision Echocardiology SystemNetwork Concepts, Inc.1997—

Also cleared against K980060: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.4 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K980060.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

This device is intended for use by health care professionals trained in the field of echocardiography or medical ultrasound. It is to be used when there is a need to convert ultrasound video to a digital video format for subsequent review and archiving. This device is also intended for use in transferring ultrasound images over digital networks and/or digital communication lines.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K030242: Fyrelink.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K030242

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026