510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ultraekogel Models EK 2000 & EK 2001

K030889510(k) TraditionalCleared May 23, 200363-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1570

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Inmed Ltda. · MUI Media, Coupling, Ultrasound

Cleared on May 23, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K802146 (Parker Laboratories, Inc., 1980) after a 63-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1980.

Decided
May 23, 2003
Review
63 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MUI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K802146 (1980). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K802146 · Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel, · Parker Laboratories, Inc. · 1980 · recalled198019851990199520002005
  1. Root · 1 generation backK802146 Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel,Parker Laboratories, Inc. · 1980 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK030889 Ultraekogel Models EK 2000 & EK 2001Inmed Ltda. · 2003
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K802146Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel,Parker Laboratories, Inc.19801
0 (this device)K030889Ultraekogel Models EK 2000 & EK 2001Inmed Ltda.2003—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K030889, 1980–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MUI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MUI device

  1. #1 K253255 Non-Sterile Ultrasound Gel Sterile Ultrasound…score 12.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K802146Aquasonic 100 Ultrasound Trans. Gel,
Summary page 1
…ULTRASONIC- GEL IO-Substantial Equivalency is claimed against the following device: AQUASONIC 100 from Parker Laboratories, Inc. 510k # K802146 I 1-Description of the Device: ULTRAEKOGELTMis an electroconductive gel media used with ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system.…
Parker Laboratories, Inc.19801

Also cleared against K802146: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K802146.

How does its category compare?

All MUI devices

MUI Media, Coupling, Ultrasound: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MUI

2in 2024

2007: 12009: 12011: 22012: 22013: 22014: 12016: 12017: 12018: 52019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 5 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MUI

434in 2018

2018: 434 days median
2007high 434 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MUI

1in 2023

2012: 22023: 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MUI

25in 2025

2008: 22009: 22010: 62012: 12013: 12014: 22018: 22019: 22020: 22021: 132022: 12023: 22024: 22025: 25
2007high 25 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MUI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—02
20091—02
20100—06
20112—00
20122—21
20132—01
20141—02
20150—00
20161—00
20171—00
2018543402
20191—02
20200—02
20211—013
20221—01
20231—12
20242—02
20250—025
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

ULTRAEKOGELm is an electroconductive gel media used with ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system. The gel -once applied on the defined area of the body- facilitates the intended use of the system, which is intended to project a pulsed sound beam into body tissue to determine the depth or location of the tissue interfaces and to measure the duration of an acoustic pulse from the transmitter to the tissue interface and back to the receiver.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K030889: Ultraekogel Models EK 2000 & EK 2001.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K030889

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026