510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cynosure Photolight PL

K031258510(k) TraditionalCleared Jul 8, 200378-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cynosure, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Jul 8, 2003 after a 78-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 20 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jul 8, 2003
Review
78 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

20 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2009: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2024: 4 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2023: 2 descendants cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK031258 Cynosure Photolight PLCynosure, Inc. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 19 of its ownK082040 Minisilk FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2009
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 18 of its ownK103288 Deka Synchro FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2011
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 17 of its ownK131095 Deka Synchro Repla: Y Family of Laser SystemsEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2013
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 16 of its ownK150516 Deka Synchro Repla:Y Family of Laser SystemsEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2015
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 4 of its ownK192539 Deka LuxeaEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2019

Showing 5 of 20 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2009: 12011: 12013: 12015: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12020: 22021: 12022: 22023: 22024: 42025: 1
2009high 4 (2024) · low 0 (2010)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 20 · See all
  • K082040Minisilk FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2009 · cites it directly19descendants
  • K103288Deka Synchro FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2011 · 2 generations on18descendants
  • K131095Deka Synchro Repla: Y Family of Laser SystemsEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2013 · 3 generations on17descendants
  • K150516Deka Synchro Repla:Y Family of Laser SystemsEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2015 · 4 generations on16descendants
  • K192539Deka LuxeaEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa · 2019 · 3 generations on4descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K031258Cynosure Photolight PLCynosure, Inc.2003—
+1K082040Minisilk FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa2009—
+2K103288Deka Synchro FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa2011—
+3K131095Deka Synchro Repla: Y Family of Laser SystemsEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa2013—
+4K150516Deka Synchro Repla:Y Family of Laser SystemsEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa2015—
+3K192539Deka LuxeaEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa2019—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910
201110
201310
201510
201610
201710
201810
201910
202020
202110
202220
202320
202440
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K031258, 2003–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—EsteLux pulsed light system
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (20)

See all 20

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K082040Minisilk FTEl.En Electronic Engineering Spa200919

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K082040 (El.En Electronic Engineering Spa, 2009) has gone furthest, with 19 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Photolight Pulsed Light device is indicated for permanent hair reduction. It is also indicated for photocoagulation of dermatological vascular lesions, photothermolysis of blood vessels (treatment of facial and leg veins), and the treatment of benign pigmented lesions.

The CoolHand cooling device is intended to provide pre-cooling of the epidermis, to reduce thermal injury to the epidermis, and to reduce patient pain and discomfort associated with light applications.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K031258: Cynosure Photolight PL.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K031258

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026