510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CDR Panx, Model 4792

K031291510(k) TraditionalCleared May 5, 200312-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.1800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Schick Technologies, Inc. · MUH System, X-Ray, Extraoral Source, Digital

Cleared on May 5, 2003 after a 12-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
May 5, 2003
Review
12 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MUH
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2006: 1 descendant clearedReference device: K982661 · CDR - Pan Model 4700 · Schick Technologies, Inc. · 1998200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK031291 CDR Panx, Model 4792Schick Technologies, Inc. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK053558 Ceph, Model 4900Schick Technologies, Inc. · 2006

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K053558Ceph, Model 4900Schick Technologies, Inc. · 2006 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K031291CDR Panx, Model 4792Schick Technologies, Inc.2003—
+1K053558Ceph, Model 4900Schick Technologies, Inc.2006—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K031291, 2003–2006Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MUH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MUH device

  1. #1 K242778 X Sensor (Model: IOS-A15IF, HDI-15DGF)score 16.0 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Soredex Cranex Tome system
Named without a submission number
—
†K982661CDR - Pan Model 4700Schick Technologies, Inc.1998—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K053558Ceph, Model 4900Schick Technologies, Inc.20060

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K053558 (Schick Technologies, Inc., 2006) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MUH devices

MUH System, X-Ray, Extraoral Source, Digital: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MUH

3in 2025

2007: 112008: 82009: 92010: 92011: 102012: 92013: 92014: 82015: 122016: 62017: 92018: 32019: 52020: 52021: 102022: 72023: 112024: 42025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 12 (2015) · low 3 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MUH

159in 2025

2007: 48 days median2008: 64 days median2009: 88 days median2010: 174 days median2011: 89 days median2012: 81 days median2013: 172 days median2014: 168 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 47 days median2017: 84 days median2018: 29 days median2019: 64 days median2020: 36 days median2021: 80 days median2022: 57 days median2023: 57 days median2024: 144 days median2025: 159 days median
2007high 174 (2010) · low 29 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MUH

1in 2015

2008: 12009: 22013: 12014: 12015: 1
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MUH

1in 2025

2009: 122010: 92012: 52013: 12014: 52015: 32016: 12017: 42018: 102019: 62021: 12023: 12025: 1
2007high 12 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MUH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007114800
200886410
2009988212
2010917409
2011108900
201298105
2013917211
2014816815
20151211113
201664701
201798404
2018329010
201956406
202053600
2021108001
202275700
2023115701
2024414400
2025315901
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The CDR PanX Model 4792 is indicated for individuals requiring extra-oral dental exams. It exposes and acquires radiographic images at the dento-maxillofacial region.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K031291: CDR Panx, Model 4792.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K031291

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026