510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2017Flex-Neck PD Catheter, Infant
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Medigroup, Inc. · FJS Catheter, Peritoneal, Long-Term Indwelling
Cleared on Sep 17, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K970159 (Janin Group, Inc., 1997) after a 141-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1997. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 3 times.
- Decided
- Sep 17, 2003
- Review
- 141 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- FJS
- Recalls
- 3
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K970159 (1997). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K070730Flex-Neck Arc CatheterMedigroup, Inc. · 2007 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K970159 | Flex-Neck PD Catheter | Janin Group, Inc. | 1997 | 1 |
| 0 (this device) | K031351 | Flex-Neck PD Catheter, Infant | Medigroup, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| +1 | K070730 | Flex-Neck Arc Catheter | Medigroup, Inc. | 2007 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in FJS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new FJS device
- #1 K213602 Argyle Peritoneal Dialysis Cathetor and Kit…score 3.0 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K970159 | Flex-Neck PD Catheter | 1997 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K070730 | Flex-Neck Arc Catheter | 2007 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017 | Class II | Z-1144-2018 | Mixed-up of materials/components | 2 Cuff catheters were incorrectly configured and labeled as 1 Cuff product and placed into these dialysis kits. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | Class II | Z-1143-2018 | Mixed-up of materials/components | 2 Cuff catheters were incorrectly configured and labeled as 1 Cuff product. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | Class II | Z-1145-2018 | Mixed-up of materials/components | 1 Cuff catheters were incorrectly configured and labeled as 2 Cuff product and placed into these dialysis kits. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
How does its category compare?
All FJS devicesFJS Catheter, Peritoneal, Long-Term Indwelling: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · FJS
1in 2022
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · FJS
120in 2012
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · FJS
1in 2014
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · FJS
140in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code FJS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2 | — | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 9 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 75 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 67 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 4 | 58 |
| 2012 | 3 | 120 | 0 | 37 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 84 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 1 | 66 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 61 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 38 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 75 |
| 2018 | 1 | — | 0 | 137 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 53 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 94 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 78 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 102 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 619 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 149 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 140 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
If the patient is a suitable candidate for peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy and is too small for the current Flex-Neck catheters, the Flex-Neck Catheter, Infant, can be implanted either surgically, peritoneoscopically or percutaneously. The only contraindication to implantation of the Flex-Neck PD Catheter, Infant, is if the patient is not a candidate for peritoneal dialysis.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K031351 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K031351: Flex-Neck PD Catheter, Infant.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K031351
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026