510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Northstar Lidocaine Iontophoretic Controller (Northstar Controller-D)

K031551510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 20, 200393-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5525

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vyteris, Inc. · KTB Device, Iontophoresis, Specific Uses

Cleared on Aug 20, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K974855 (Iomed, Inc., 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 93-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994.

Decided
Aug 20, 2003
Review
93 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KTB
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K934335 (1994). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1999: 1 other ancestorK934335 · Phoresor II Auto, Model PM800 Modification · Iomed, Inc. · 1994K974855 · Phoresor II, Model PM900 · Iomed, Inc. · 19981990199520002005
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K974855 · Phoresor II, Model PM900 · Iomed, Inc. · 1998K934335 · Phoresor II Auto, Model PM800 Modification · Iomed, Inc. · 19940
  1. Root · 2 generations backK934335 Phoresor II Auto, Model PM800 ModificationIomed, Inc. · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK974855 Phoresor II, Model PM900Iomed, Inc. · 1998
  3. This deviceK031551 Northstar Lidocaine Iontophoretic Controller (Northstar Controller-D)Vyteris, Inc. · 2003
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K934335Phoresor II Auto, Model PM800 ModificationIomed, Inc.1994—
−1K974855Phoresor II, Model PM900Iomed, Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K031551Northstar Lidocaine Iontophoretic Controller (Northstar Controller-D)Vyteris, Inc.2003—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K031551, 1994–2003Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KTB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974855Phoresor II, Model PM900
Summary page 1
…d 21CFR890.5525 paragraph a (revised April 1,2002) 5.4 Predicate Device: Iontophoresis Device PhoresorB 11, Model PM900 K974855 & K982668 Manufactured by: IOMED, Inc. 3385 West 1820 South Salt Lake City, U…
Iomed, Inc.1998—
*K982668Phoresor II,Model PM900
Summary page 1
….5525 paragraph a (revised April 1,2002) 5.4 Predicate Device: Iontophoresis Device PhoresorB 11, Model PM900 K974855 & K982668 Manufactured by: IOMED, Inc. 3385 West 1820 South Salt Lake City, UT 84104…
Iomed, Inc.1999—

Also cleared against K974855: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 9 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.4 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K974855.

How does its category compare?

All KTB devices

KTB Device, Iontophoresis, Specific Uses: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KTB

1in 2018

2018: 1
2007high 1 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KTB

Too few KTB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · KTB

No recall names KTB since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · KTB

1in 2012

2007: 42008: 12009: 22010: 12011: 12012: 1
2007high 4 (2007) · low 0 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KTB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—04
20080—01
20090—02
20100—01
20110—01
20120—01
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20181—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Northstar System is indicated for the administration of lidocaine hydrochloride to provide local dermal anesthesia on normal intact skin. This system is an alternative to hypodermic injection or topical application of lidocaine hydrochloride.

Northstar System is indicated for use on patients 5 years of age and older.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K031551: Northstar Lidocaine Iontophoretic Controller (Northstar Controller-D).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K031551

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026