510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Tigris DTS Automated Analyzer for Automating Amplified Nucleic Acid Test Assays

K032194510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 24, 2003159-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.3390

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Gen-Probe, Inc. · LSL Dna-Reagents, Neisseria

Cleared on Dec 24, 2003 after a 159-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Dec 24, 2003
Review
159 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LSL
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK032194 Tigris DTS Automated Analyzer for Automating Amplified Nucleic Acid…Gen-Probe, Inc. · 2003
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK111409 Aptima Combo 2 AssayGen-Probe, Inc. · 2012
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK132251 Aptima Combo 2 Assay (Panther System)Hologic / Gen-Probe Incorporated · 2013 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K111409Aptima Combo 2 AssayGen-Probe, Inc. · 2012 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K132251Aptima Combo 2 Assay (Panther System)Hologic / Gen-Probe Incorporated · 2013 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K032194Tigris DTS Automated Analyzer for Automating Amplified Nucleic Acid Test AssaysGen-Probe, Inc.2003—
+1K111409Aptima Combo 2 AssayGen-Probe, Inc.2012—
+2K132251Aptima Combo 2 Assay (Panther System)Hologic / Gen-Probe Incorporated20132

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
201310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K032194, 2003–2013Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LSL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LSL device

  1. #1 K231329 Aptima Neisseria gonorrhoeae Assayscore 6.8 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K111409Aptima Combo 2 AssayGen-Probe, Inc.20121

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K111409 (Gen-Probe, Inc., 2012) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LSL devices

LSL Dna-Reagents, Neisseria: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LSL

1in 2024

2007: 22008: 12009: 32012: 22013: 22014: 32017: 12018: 32024: 1
2007high 3 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LSL

90in 2018

2009: 62 days median2014: 86 days median2018: 90 days median
2007high 90 (2018) · low 62 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LSL

1in 2017

2017: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LSL

41in 2025

2009: 42010: 12011: 12013: 12014: 42015: 62016: 62017: 102018: 72019: 142020: 32021: 42022: 112023: 192024: 172025: 41
2007high 41 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LSL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
20081—00
200936204
20100—01
20110—01
20122—00
20132—01
201438604
20150—06
20160—06
20171—110
201839007
20190—014
20200—03
20210—04
20220—011
20230—019
20241—017
20250—041
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The APTIMA Combo 2 Assay is a target amplification nucleic acid probe test that utilizes target capture for the in vitro qualitative detection and differentiation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) from Chlamydia trachomatis and/or Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical and male urethral swab specimens, and in female and male urine specimens. The assay may be used to test specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals to aid in the diagnosis of gonococcal and/or chlamydial urogenital disease using the TIGRIS DTS Automated Analyzer or semi-automated instrumentation as specified.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K032194: Tigris DTS Automated Analyzer for Automating Amplified Nucleic Acid Test Assays.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K032194

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026