510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · 2010Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Stryker Instruments · HBE Drills, Burrs, Trephines & Accessories (Simple, Powered)
Cleared on Jan 16, 2004 as substantially equivalent to K943540 (Stryker Corp., 1994) and 5 other predicates after a 175-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1993. 14 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 65 times.
- Decided
- Jan 16, 2004
- Review
- 175 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- HBE
- Recalls
- 65
- Predicates
- 6
Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K931783 (1993). 15 ancestors in all, the oldest K771218 (1978). 14 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.
- Root · 5 generations backK931783 Aesop (Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal PosComputer Motion, Inc. · 1993
- 4 generations backK960655 Aesop System and AccessoriesComputer Motion, Inc. · 1996
- 3 generations backK973700 Hermes Operating Room Control CenterComputer Motion, Inc. · 1998
- 2 generations backK980787 Hermes Operating Room Control Center with the Wom 20L InsufflatorComputer Motion, Inc. · 1998
- 1 generation backK991696 Stryker Hermes-Ready Total Performance SystemStryker Instruments · 1999
- This deviceK032303 Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) SystemStryker Instruments · 2004
- Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK040369 Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) SystemStryker Instruments · 2004 · Recalled
- Descendant · cites it directly · 7 of its ownK040300 Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core)Stryker Instruments · 2004 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK132264 PRIMADO2 Total Surgical SystemNakanishi, Inc. · 2013
- Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK071859 Stryker Crossfire SystemStryker Endoscopy · 2007 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK162770 Relign SystemRelign Corporation · 2017
Showing 5 of 14 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 14 · See all- K040369Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) SystemStryker Instruments · 2004 · cites it directly7descendants
- K040300Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core)Stryker Instruments · 2004 · cites it directly7descendants
- K132264PRIMADO2 Total Surgical SystemNakanishi, Inc. · 2013 · 2 generations on6descendants
- K071859Stryker Crossfire SystemStryker Endoscopy · 2007 · cites it directly4descendants
- K162770Relign SystemRelign Corporation · 2017 · 2 generations on2descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5 | K931783 | Aesop (Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal Pos | Computer Motion, Inc. | 1993 | — |
| −4 | K960655 | Aesop System and Accessories | Computer Motion, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| −3 | K973700 | Hermes Operating Room Control Center | Computer Motion, Inc. | 1998 | — |
| −2 | K980787 | Hermes Operating Room Control Center with the Wom 20L Insufflator | Computer Motion, Inc. | 1998 | — |
| −1 | K991696 | Stryker Hermes-Ready Total Performance System | Stryker Instruments | 1999 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K032303 | Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) System | Stryker Instruments | 2004 | — |
| +1 | K040369 | Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) System | Stryker Instruments | 2004 | 8 |
| +1 | K040300 | Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) | Stryker Instruments | 2004 | 8 |
| +2 | K132264 | PRIMADO2 Total Surgical System | Nakanishi, Inc. | 2013 | — |
| +1 | K071859 | Stryker Crossfire System | Stryker Endoscopy | 2007 | 2 |
| +2 | K162770 | Relign System | Relign Corporation | 2017 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1978 | 1 | 0 |
| 1994 | 4 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in HBE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new HBE device
- #1 K251433 Surgify Halo (54.085.SHD.H1); Surgify Halo…score 13.2 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (6)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K943540 | Surgical Cutting BursSummary page 1…wered Simple Cranial Drill, Burrs, Trephines and their Accessories (per 21 CFR section 882.4310) Equivalent to! Stryker TPS (Dental-K943540, ENT-K943569, Neuro- 943541), TPS Hermes (991696), Stryker Navigation System (K012380) and Dyonics… | 1994 |
| * | K943569 | Stryker Total Performance SystemSummary page 1…Cranial Drill, Burrs, Trephines and their Accessories (per 21 CFR section 882.4310) Equivalent to! Stryker TPS (Dental-K943540, ENT-K943569, Neuro- 943541), TPS Hermes (991696), Stryker Navigation System (K012380) and Dyonics… | 1995 |
| * | K943541 | 75K Staight DrillSummary page 1…s. Technological Technological characteristics are the same as previously cleared Comparison: for the Stryker TPS System (K943540, K943569, K943541, and K991696), Stryker Navigation System (K012380) and Dyonics (K771218).… | 1995 |
| * | K991696 | Stryker Hermes-Ready Total Performance SystemSummary page 1…gical characteristics are the same as previously cleared Comparison: for the Stryker TPS System (K943540, K943569, K943541, and K991696), Stryker Navigation System (K012380) and Dyonics (K771218). Submitted by: Jean W. Shepp… | 1999 |
| * | K012380 | Modification to: Stryker Navigation System, Stryker Fluoroscopy System,Virtual FluoroscopySummary page 1…882.4310) Equivalent to! Stryker TPS (Dental-K943540, ENT-K943569, Neuro- 943541), TPS Hermes (991696), Stryker Navigation System (K012380) and Dyonics (K771218). Device Description: The device description of the Stryker System include… | 2001 |
| * | K771218 | Intra-Articular ShaverSummary page 1…S (Dental-K943540, ENT-K943569, Neuro- 943541), TPS Hermes (991696), Stryker Navigation System (K012380) and Dyonics (K771218). Device Description: The device description of the Stryker System includes drills, shavers, shi… | 1978 |
What descends from it? (14)
See all 143 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1244-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1240-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1242-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1233-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1238-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1239-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1237-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1241-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1236-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1243-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1235-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1232-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | Not classified | Z-1234-2011 | Packaging | Product was packaged with an incorrect packaging material and therefore has a potential to be non-sterile which, if contaminated, could lead to a patient infection. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | Not classified | Z-0598-2010 | Device Design | The bur may fracture, resulting in fragments within the surgical site, injury to the patient or surgical team, or both. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | Not classified | Z-0596-2010 | Device Design | The bur may fracture, resulting in fragments within the surgical site, injury to the patient or surgical team, or both. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | Not classified | Z-0597-2010 | Device Design | The bur may fracture, resulting in fragments within the surgical site, injury to the patient or surgical team, or both. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | Not classified | Z-0595-2010 | Device Design | The bur may fracture, resulting in fragments within the surgical site, injury to the patient or surgical team, or both. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | Not classified | Z-0599-2010 | Device Design | The bur may fracture, resulting in fragments within the surgical site, injury to the patient or surgical team, or both. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1027-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1024-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1030-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1000-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0993-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1032-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1007-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1013-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1026-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1020-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1028-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0992-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0999-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1025-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1004-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0989-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1015-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1011-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1034-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1014-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0994-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1019-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0991-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1022-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1023-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0995-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0997-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1033-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1012-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-0998-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1016-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | Not classified | Z-1001-2008 | Package design/selection | Lack of assurance of sterility. |
The 5 latest of 50 recalls; the web page lists all.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 11 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
- 3 of the 15 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K040369 (Stryker Instruments, 2004) has gone furthest, with 7 descendants of its own.
- 4 other devices also cite its predicate K943540.
How does its category compare?
All HBE devicesHBE Drills, Burrs, Trephines & Accessories (Simple, Powered): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · HBE
6in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · HBE
30in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · HBE
1in 2024
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · HBE
1,924in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code HBE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2 | — | 0 | 14 |
| 2008 | 2 | — | 47 | 14 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 7 | 242 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 23 | 492 |
| 2011 | 2 | — | 1 | 1,013 |
| 2012 | 1 | — | 26 | 1,146 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 4 | 1,583 |
| 2014 | 2 | — | 0 | 559 |
| 2015 | 3 | 155 | 0 | 483 |
| 2016 | 2 | — | 7 | 848 |
| 2017 | 2 | — | 3 | 848 |
| 2018 | 2 | — | 0 | 787 |
| 2019 | 5 | 133 | 0 | 836 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 1,025 |
| 2021 | 6 | 193 | 1 | 1,047 |
| 2022 | 2 | — | 0 | 900 |
| 2023 | 2 | — | 3 | 948 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 1 | 1,153 |
| 2025 | 6 | 30 | 0 | 1,924 |
| 2026 | 1 | — | 19 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (CORE)System is intended for use in the cutting, drilling, reaming, decorticating, and smoothing of bone and bone cement in a variety of surgical procedures, including but not limited to Neuro and Enndoscopic. It is also usable in the placement or cutting of screws, metal, wires, pins, and other fixation devices. The cndoscopic applications with CORE include use with the SE5 Small Joint Shaver in the…
Read the full statement (115 words)
The Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (CORE)System is intended for use in the cutting, drilling, reaming, decorticating, and smoothing of bone and bone cement in a variety of surgical procedures, including but not limited to Neuro and Enndoscopic. It is also usable in the placement or cutting of screws, metal, wires, pins, and other fixation devices.
The cndoscopic applications with CORE include use with the SE5 Small Joint Shaver in the wrist for any need for morselization of tissue within the joint. Cutters will be used to debride synovitis, ,uticular cartilage flaps. or torn ligaments when surgeons deem resection appropriate. Burs are indicated for management of osseous lesions such as eburnated articular surfaces or osteophytes.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K032303 · printed Nov 3, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K032303: Stryker Consolidated Operating Room Equipment (Core) System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K032303
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026