510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Epi-Scan, Model P 100

K032935510(k) SpecialCleared Nov 20, 200359-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.1540

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Edx Epi-Scan, Inc. · GZO Device, Galvanic Skin Response Measurement

Cleared on Nov 20, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K874850 (Epi-Scan Corp., 1988) after a 59-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988. 6 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Nov 20, 2003
Review
59 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GZO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K874850 (1988). 6 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2010: 2 descendants cleared2015: 2 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant clearedK874850 · Epi-Scan Selective Tissue Conductance Meter · Epi-Scan Corp. · 19881990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 3 descendants3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant K874850 · Epi-Scan Selective Tissue Conductance Meter · Epi-Scan Corp. · 19880
  1. Root · 1 generation backK874850 Epi-Scan Selective Tissue Conductance MeterEpi-Scan Corp. · 1988
  2. This deviceK032935 Epi-Scan, Model P 100Edx Epi-Scan, Inc. · 2003
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 5 of its ownK100233 SudoscanImpeto Medical · 2010
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK102166 Electro Interstitial ScanLd Technology, LLC · 2010
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK141872 SudoscanImpeto Medical, Inc. · 2014
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK131568 Sudo PathLd Technology, LLC · 2013
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK150804 QBioScanMedeia, Inc. · 2015

Showing 5 of 6 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2010: 22013: 12014: 12015: 2
2010high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2011)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 6 · See all
  • K100233SudoscanImpeto Medical · 2010 · cites it directly5descendants
  • K102166Electro Interstitial ScanLd Technology, LLC · 2010 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K141872SudoscanImpeto Medical, Inc. · 2014 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K131568Sudo PathLd Technology, LLC · 2013 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K150804QBioScanMedeia, Inc. · 2015 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K874850Epi-Scan Selective Tissue Conductance MeterEpi-Scan Corp.1988—
0 (this device)K032935Epi-Scan, Model P 100Edx Epi-Scan, Inc.2003—
+1K100233SudoscanImpeto Medical2010—
+2K102166Electro Interstitial ScanLd Technology, LLC2010—
+2K141872SudoscanImpeto Medical, Inc.2014—
+3K131568Sudo PathLd Technology, LLC2013—
+2K150804QBioScanMedeia, Inc.2015—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201020
201310
201410
201520
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K032935, 1988–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GZO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K874850Epi-Scan Selective Tissue Conductance Meter
Summary page 1
…lvanic Skin Response Measurement Device The legally marketed device to which we are claiming equivalence [807.92(a)(3)]: K874850, Epi-Scan Selective Tissue Conductance Meter submitted by EDX Epi-Scan Inc Description of the device: The dev…
Epi-Scan Corp.1988—

What descends from it? (6)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K100233SudoscanImpeto Medical20105

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K100233 (Impeto Medical, 2010) has gone furthest, with 5 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GZO devices

GZO Device, Galvanic Skin Response Measurement: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GZO

2in 2015

2010: 22011: 12013: 12014: 12015: 2
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GZO

Too few GZO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · GZO

No recall names GZO since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · GZO

2in 2024

2008: 12010: 12012: 12014: 12017: 12018: 192021: 12024: 2
2007high 19 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GZO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20090—00
20102—01
20111—00
20120—01
20131—00
20141—01
20152—00
20160—00
20170—01
20180—019
20190—00
20200—00
20210—01
20220—00
20230—00
20240—02
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

For the measurement of galvanic skin response.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K032935: Epi-Scan, Model P 100.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K032935

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026