510(k) · Cleared
ClearedCompact Digital Cardiac Camera (CDCC)
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Is2 Medical Systems, Inc. · KPS System, Tomography, Computed, Emission
Cleared on Nov 12, 2003 after a 41-day review. The summary cites one number, which could not be confirmed as its predicate (see the table below). 1 later device descends from it.
- Decided
- Nov 12, 2003
- Review
- 41 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- KPS
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 1
1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- This deviceK033199 Compact Digital Cardiac Camera (CDCC)Is2 Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK040057 Mobile Compact Digital Cardiac CameraIs2 Research, Inc. · 2004
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K040057Mobile Compact Digital Cardiac CameraIs2 Research, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K033199 | Compact Digital Cardiac Camera (CDCC) | Is2 Medical Systems, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| +1 | K040057 | Mobile Compact Digital Cardiac Camera | Is2 Research, Inc. | 2004 | — |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in KPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new KPS device
- #1 K253564 uMI Panvivo (uMI Panvivo); uMI Panvivo (uMI…score 18.6 · 17 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kept off the family tree | K003882 | FDA’s K003882 is Nucamma BI90 Not matched in our reading of the summary (scans can blur digits), so it is kept off the family tree | 2001 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K040057 | Mobile Compact Digital Cardiac Camera | 2004 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K040057 (Is2 Research, Inc., 2004) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All KPS devicesKPS System, Tomography, Computed, Emission: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · KPS
12in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · KPS
65in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · KPS
16in 2025
Class I (17 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · KPS
36in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code KPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 8 | 38 | 22 | 38 |
| 2008 | 17 | 25 | 16 | 11 |
| 2009 | 9 | 42 | 14 | 15 |
| 2010 | 3 | 91 | 4 | 44 |
| 2011 | 7 | 28 | 34 | 56 |
| 2012 | 6 | 94 | 13 | 34 |
| 2013 | 11 | 84 | 13 | 240 |
| 2014 | 11 | 92 | 18 | 33 |
| 2015 | 3 | 112 | 5 | 24 |
| 2016 | 11 | 65 | 16 | 10 |
| 2017 | 11 | 104 | 11 | 31 |
| 2018 | 13 | 59 | 12 (3) | 26 |
| 2019 | 3 | 60 | 5 (5) | 105 |
| 2020 | 12 | 72 | 8 | 22 |
| 2021 | 15 | 66 | 4 | 10 |
| 2022 | 5 | 60 | 8 (6) | 15 |
| 2023 | 12 | 63 | 6 (3) | 22 |
| 2024 | 11 | 59 | 15 | 23 |
| 2025 | 12 | 65 | 16 | 36 |
| 2026 | 6 | 67 | 6 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The intended use of the COMPACT DIGITAL CARDIAC CAMERA is to detect the location and distribution of gamma ray emitting radionuclides in the body and store data for analysis. This device includes accessories such as signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, radionuclide anatomical markers, component parts and accessories.
To detect or image the distribution of radionuclides in the body or organ using the following technique(s): Planar Imaging; Tomographic Imaging (SPECT) for non-Positron emitter.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K033199 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K033199: Compact Digital Cardiac Camera (CDCC).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K033199
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026