510(k) · Cleared
ClearedContinum V
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Aalba Dent, Inc. · EJH Alloy, Metal, Base
Cleared on Mar 4, 2004 after a 37-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
- Decided
- Mar 4, 2004
- Review
- 37 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- EJH
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in EJH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
What was it cleared against?
FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All EJH devicesEJH Alloy, Metal, Base: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · EJH
1in 2013
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · EJH
Too few EJH 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · EJH
No recall names EJH since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · EJH
1in 2018
MAUDE reports naming product code EJH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
This device is a non precious, nickel-chromium-molybdenum-beryllium crown based ceramic bonded ceramic casting alloy for use in the construction of cast and bridge prosthetic devices. According to 21 CFR Ch. 1 (4-1-89 Ed.) Part 872, the classification name for this device is Base Metal Alloy, a Class II device.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.
https://510kreport.com/device/K040180 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K040180: Continum V.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K040180
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026