510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · 2010Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Model 03-125-ZZZZ
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Implex Corp. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer
Cleared on Sep 30, 2004 after a 204-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. 76 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.
- Decided
- Sep 30, 2004
- Review
- 204 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JWH
- Recalls
- 2
- Predicates
- 0
76 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.
- This deviceK040630 Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Model 03-125-ZZZZImplex Corp. · 2004
- Descendant · cites it directly · 75 of its ownK051756 Modification to:Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Models…Zimmer Trabecular · 2005
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 74 of its ownK053340 Trabecular Metal Tibial and Femoral Cone AugmentsZimmer Trabecular · 2006
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 53 of its ownK100391 Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010
- Descendant · 3 generations on · 40 of its ownK143393 Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · Recalled
- Descendant · 4 generations on · 24 of its ownK172326 Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee…Stryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · Recalled
Showing 5 of 76 descendants. See all descendants
Descendants cleared per year
Most influential descendants
Showing 5 of 76 · See all- K051756Modification to:Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Models 03-125-ZZZZZimmer Trabecular · 2005 · cites it directly75descendants
- K053340Trabecular Metal Tibial and Femoral Cone AugmentsZimmer Trabecular · 2006 · 2 generations on74descendants
- K100391Depuy Universal Gription TF ConesDePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · 2010 · 2 generations on53descendants
- K143393Triathlon Tritanium Cone AugmentsStryker Orthopaedics · 2015 · 3 generations on40descendants
- K172326Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee SystemStryker Orthopaedics · 2017 · 4 generations on24descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (this device) | K040630 | Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Model 03-125-ZZZZ | Implex Corp. | 2004 | — |
| +1 | K051756 | Modification to:Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Models 03-125-ZZZZ | Zimmer Trabecular | 2005 | — |
| +2 | K053340 | Trabecular Metal Tibial and Femoral Cone Augments | Zimmer Trabecular | 2006 | — |
| +2 | K100391 | Depuy Universal Gription TF Cones | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| +3 | K143393 | Triathlon Tritanium Cone Augments | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2015 | 1 |
| +4 | K172326 | Triathlon Total Knee System, Triathlon PKR System, Restoris MCK Knee System | Stryker Orthopaedics | 2017 | 1 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3 | 0 |
| 2018 | 7 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9 | 0 |
| 2021 | 4 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device
- #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against?
The FDA summary names no predicate by number.
What descends from it? (76)
See all 763 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2010 | Not classified | Z-2440-2010 | Labeling mix-ups | Zimmer, Inc. has determined that there is a potential for the packages to be mislabeled. Specifically, the left femoral cone augment component may be labeled as a right and the right femoral cone augment component may be labeled as a left. |
| Jul 5, 2010 | Not classified | Z-2439-2010 | Labeling mix-ups | Zimmer, Inc. has determined that there is a potential for the packages to be mislabeled. Specifically, the left femoral cone augment component may be labeled as a right and the right femoral cone augment component may be labeled as a left. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Of its descendants, K051756 (Zimmer Trabecular, 2005) has gone furthest, with 75 descendants of its own.
How does its category compare?
All JWH devicesJWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JWH
20in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JWH
55in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JWH
2in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JWH
9,306in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 18 | 74 | 14 | 1,305 |
| 2008 | 17 | 81 | 10 | 1,483 |
| 2009 | 11 | 168 | 109 | 1,870 |
| 2010 | 19 | 85 | 32 | 3,286 |
| 2011 | 25 | 87 | 27 | 5,133 |
| 2012 | 33 | 85 | 85 | 5,203 |
| 2013 | 31 | 128 | 31 | 6,135 |
| 2014 | 33 | 98 | 13 | 6,722 |
| 2015 | 27 | 87 | 11 | 6,881 |
| 2016 | 18 | 88 | 17 | 7,586 |
| 2017 | 25 | 118 | 61 | 12,263 |
| 2018 | 25 | 90 | 14 | 14,071 |
| 2019 | 28 | 133 | 5 | 14,987 |
| 2020 | 22 | 59 | 2 | 12,592 |
| 2021 | 24 | 61 | 8 | 9,408 |
| 2022 | 17 | 56 | 12 | 8,364 |
| 2023 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 8,947 |
| 2024 | 19 | 89 | 7 | 10,828 |
| 2025 | 20 | 55 | 2 | 9,306 |
| 2026 | 12 | 63 | 4 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments are indicated for use in the reconstruction of bony defects in knee reconstruction due to severe degeneration, trauma, or other pathology of the knee joint, and in the revision or salvage of failed, previously reconstructed knee procedures and implants. The Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments are for cemented use only in the USA, and for cementless or cemented use outside the USA.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K040630 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K040630: Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments, Model 03-125-ZZZZ.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K040630
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026