510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2012

Modification to Restoration Modular System

K040734510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 25, 2004156-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented

Cleared on Aug 25, 2004 after a 156-day review. The FDA summary names no predicate by number. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Aug 25, 2004
Review
156 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LZO
Recalls
2
Predicates
0

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K040734Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LZO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LZO device

  1. #1 K192827 Quadra-Pscore 19.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

The FDA summary names no predicate by number.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Apr 2, 2012Class IIZ-2487-2012Device DesignStryker Orthopaedics has become aware of a burr, or a metal shaving, observed in the internal threaded portion of the Cone Body Trial. The typical size of the shaving observed was 1-2 mm in length and 0.037 mm squared in cross section.
Apr 2, 2009Not classifiedZ-1642-2009Process controlPackaging burst test values for the Restoration Modular Cone Body family were found to be incorrectly transferred from the finalized validation to the work specification. Testing showed that burst test results for recalled products fell…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LZO devices

LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LZO

14in 2025

2007: 92008: 112009: 72010: 152011: 132012: 142013: 262014: 132015: 122016: 102017: 162018: 182019: 282020: 182021: 122022: 112023: 102024: 112025: 142026 (partial year): 9
2007high 28 (2019) · low 7 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LZO

119in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 63 days median2009: 83 days median2010: 78 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 98 days median2013: 100 days median2014: 85 days median2015: 115 days median2016: 177 days median2017: 257 days median2018: 163 days median2019: 109 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 170 days median2022: 279 days median2023: 122 days median2024: 111 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 102 days median
2007high 279 (2022) · low 63 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LZO

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 132009: 422011: 102012: 142014: 12015: 12016: 92017: 52018: 22019: 42020: 32022: 42023: 22024: 12025: 1
2007high 42 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LZO

3,244in 2025

2007: 1382008: 1252009: 1892010: 3942011: 5442012: 9632013: 1,3702014: 1,4772015: 1,3482016: 1,7282017: 2,1652018: 3,1332019: 3,0662020: 1,9632021: 2,1992022: 1,9852023: 2,0662024: 2,5862025: 3,244
2007high 3,244 (2025) · low 125 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LZO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20079872138
2008116313125
200978342189
201015780394
2011138710544
2012149814963
20132610001,370
2014138511,477
20151211511,348
20161017791,728
20171625752,165
20181816323,133
20192810943,066
20201811231,963
20211217002,199
20221127941,985
20231012222,066
20241111112,586
20251411913,244
202691020—

What is it indicated for?

The Restoration® Modular System is intended for primary or revision total hip arthroplasty, as well as in tile presence of severe proximal bone loss. These femoral stems are designed to be press fit into the proximal femur. Examples of specific indications for use of the Restoration® Modular System include:

Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis,

Rheumatoid arthritis,

Correction of functional deformity,

Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed, and

Treatment of nonunion, femoral neck and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K040734: Modification to Restoration Modular System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K040734

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026