510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Millenium, Models 2000, 2001 and 2002

K041007510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 15, 2004210-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5470

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Hyperbaric For Life, LLC · CBF Chamber, Hyperbaric

Cleared on Nov 15, 2004 after a 210-day review. FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 15, 2004
Review
210 days
Class
Class II
Product code
CBF
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2011: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK041007 Millenium, Models 2000, 2001 and 2002Hyperbaric For Life, LLC · 2004
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK102831 RSI 4200Reimers Systems, Inc. · 2011

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K102831RSI 4200Reimers Systems, Inc. · 2011 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K041007Millenium, Models 2000, 2001 and 2002Hyperbaric For Life, LLC2004—
+1K102831RSI 4200Reimers Systems, Inc.2011—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K041007, 2004–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA 510(k) statement (indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in CBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new CBF device

  1. #1 K240569 FESL FINK Chamber; FEDL FINK Chamber; FETL…score 8.7 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA’s file for it is a 510(k) statement, which names no predicate.

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K102831RSI 4200Reimers Systems, Inc.20110

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K102831 (Reimers Systems, Inc., 2011) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All CBF devices

CBF Chamber, Hyperbaric: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · CBF

1in 2024

2008: 32009: 12010: 32011: 12014: 12016: 12017: 12019: 12023: 12024: 1
2007high 3 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · CBF

87in 2010

2008: 134 days median2010: 87 days median
2007high 134 (2008) · low 87 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · CBF

2in 2008

2008: 2
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CBF

25in 2025

2007: 22009: 12010: 112011: 52012: 92013: 12014: 52015: 32016: 52017: 92018: 52019: 32020: 42021: 62022: 92023: 132024: 132025: 25
2007high 25 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—02
2008313420
20091—01
2010387011
20111—05
20120—09
20130—01
20141—05
20150—03
20161—05
20171—09
20180—05
20191—03
20200—04
20210—06
20220—09
20231—013
20241—013
20250—025
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The conditions listed as appropriate for the use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the current edition of the Undersea and Hyperbaric and Medical Society (UHMS) Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Committee Report (1998) are as follows Air or gas embolism Carbon monoxide poisoning and carbon monoxide poisoning complicated by cyanide poisoning Clostridial myositis and myonecrosis Crush injury, compartment syndrome, and other acute traumatic ischemias Decompression…

Read the full statement (97 words)

The conditions listed as appropriate for the use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the current edition of the Undersea and Hyperbaric and Medical Society (UHMS) Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Committee Report (1998) are as follows

Air or gas embolism

Carbon monoxide poisoning and carbon monoxide poisoning complicated by cyanide poisoning

Clostridial myositis and myonecrosis

Crush injury, compartment syndrome, and other acute traumatic ischemias

Decompression sickness

Enhanced healing of selected problem wounds

Exceptional blood loss anemia

Necrotizing soft tissue infections

Osteomyelitis (refractory)

Delayed radiation injury (soft tissue and bone necrosis)

Skin grafts and flaps (compromised)

Thermal burns

Intracranial abscess

Indications for use as stated in the FDA 510(k) statement.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K041007: Millenium, Models 2000, 2001 and 2002.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K041007

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026